It is all the fault of the fucking French boy. Or rather, it is all the fault of the French boy Jack is fucking.
Not that Ianto is jealous. Why would he be? Not after what happened-not after what Jack did to Lisa. Not even weeks afterwards, not even when Jack has been so polite, so eager to conquer Ianto’s heart and mind, win him back into the
(
Read more... )
Comments 37
I'm not sure I can imagine Jack concatenating sex and power in that way - "I'll prove who is in charge here by making you submit sexually" is to me too much a product of our own times and attitudes for it to fit. And there's nothing in canon!Ianto that suggests to me that he would react to being hit in any way other than to hit back.
But then exploring those alternatives is one of the rightful roles of fiction, and there's no way your very strong work is invalidated by my squickiness.
Reply
First off, the punching (or not). As I said to miss_zedem, I'm more than happy to admit that a punch would have been extremely possible, and I only narrowly chose over not including a return-punch myself, for reasons I explained above (but not, I think, very coherently: my brain seems to be mush this morning). My main motive for not including it was Ianto's shock--I didn't believe that even with an angry Jack he would expect to be punched; Ianto was certainly caught up in his own (justified) rant at the time--; however, I can see how this is a weak part of the story and I'll definitely keep that in mind ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Jack isn't sending a message here, he actually isn't attempting to be dominant - he's just lost it like the kid in the playground that's just been called a wanker.
That explains what I was trying to say three billion times better than I managed it, and it was several times more concise, too. I was trying to convey a situation that's definitely dubious, but comes out on the side of angry people being aggressive rather than someone trying to express control in an entire interpersonal relationship.
Agreed, Ianto most likely wouldn't be Catholic even if he were religious--and also self-harm in all its forms is a really understandable squick to have! I can see an argument for that being too much authorial interference there, if that phrase makes sense: I'm an atheist, but I do have a weakness for the absolution-through-pain idea (and for the inner-peace-through-hard-work concept, so I may not be a religious person but have clearly inherited some of religion's
Reply
Reply
Reply
Can't wait to read it again!
Reply
(Also, your icon makes me giggle. It's so true.)
Reply
Terribly well written.
Reply
Reply
if you need me, i'll be in my bunk....
absolutely lovely angry sex between two equally absolutely angry people.
*waves a hand to gesture words*
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment