Paid account feature FAQs with no links to FAQ21?

[bekijane]

These don't link back to FAQ21 where they perhaps should;
FAQ64 - custom mood theme
FAQ69 - add a poll
FAQ123 - use directory
FAQ129 - forward domain
FAQ183 record voice posts

Comments

[jc]

I've been thinking that it might be an idea to create a template style box at the top of any affected FAQs, similar to the one in #129, saying something along the lines of "the feature or features discussed within this FAQ require the purchase of a paid account. → More information"

As long as we don't have wiki-style template insertion capabilities, the wording in the box would be generic enough to not need changing other than once in a blue moon, and the subsequent redundant references to paid accounts in the body of FAQs could be removed. Thoughts?

[seaofdestiny]

Sounds like a plan to me.

[bekijane]

I say yes - if it's obvious that we're talking about a paid account benefit and the link to more info on how to buy a paid account is a) there and b) equally as obvious, then this is good. If it requires less work on update for docadmins, then that's even better.

*big green thumb*

[decadence1]

We could *use* green thumbs even? To denote paid features I mean á la the site map? ...'Course then we'd probably need a key in each FAQ to explain what the green thumb was, defeating the object.

[burr86]

Added in links to 21 to all, thanks!