why am i awake

May 22, 2010 08:58

Sexuality is infinitely complex and variable. It's a subject on which many papers have been published, debates have been waged, hypotheses defended, etc etc etc. NO DEBATES HERE, THOUGH. JUST A QUESTION (WHICH I KNOW HAS BEEN POSED BEFORE BUT IT WAS A REALLY LONG TIME AGO):

If you had to put your character on the Kinsey scale (whether you ( Read more... )

this is not a meme, stranger danger!, dazzler does dallas, poll, batman is gay, science what are you, serious poll is finally fucking serious, batman is not gay!!, trust me i'm a doctor, sexytime is one of the tags?

Leave a comment

Comments 432

bluffing_ruffle May 22 2010, 13:03:32 UTC
Six.

Yeah, I know. It's supposedly not really that possible. But if the man isn't interested in sneaking into a stewardess' bedroom, doesn't bat an eye at big monstro jiggly tits bouncing around when every other guy in the courtroom is falling over themselves, thinks perfume is disgusting, has no wish to discuss chicks in bathtubs, refers to the women who apparently like him with a term of distaste and has to have it pointed out to him that they do in the first place, I sincerely doubt heterosexual encounters register anywhere at all on his list of 'yes please'.

And since I don't play him--or at least, this particular account of him--as asexual? Bluffles = six.

Reply

superxgrlfriend May 22 2010, 13:12:16 UTC
THOSE ARE VERY CONVINCING ARGUMENTS.

Reply

bluffing_ruffle May 22 2010, 13:16:27 UTC
I could have used more than those but I doubt anyone wants me to sit here and make an essay of it when it can be summarized to humorous effect.

Reply

superxgrlfriend May 22 2010, 13:19:23 UTC
It's too early for essays, anyway. At least it is on the east coast.

Reply


notapoof May 22 2010, 13:07:39 UTC
0. Definitely Zero. As in Gene Hunt couldn't get any straighter. He would rather kill himself slowly than be remotely interested in another guy. :|;;

Reply

superxgrlfriend May 22 2010, 13:10:27 UTC
IT'S NOT AS IF IT'S IN HIS USERNAME OR ANYTHING LOLOLOL

Reply

notapoof May 22 2010, 13:11:40 UTC
LMFAO YEAH TRUE

GENE IS A MAN'S MAN WHO IS TOTALLY MANLY AND MAKES OTHER MEN FEEL INFERIOR BY BEING IN THE SAME ROOM IN TERMS ON MANLINESS.

Reply

superxgrlfriend May 22 2010, 13:20:21 UTC
BETTER STAY AWAY LESS WE WANT TO BE SHOWERED IN TESTOSTERONE.

Reply


hhhhfuckedagain May 22 2010, 13:13:49 UTC
How about "moneysexual"? She'll do things for money.

:D

Reply

superxgrlfriend May 22 2010, 13:15:09 UTC
I THINK THAT WORKS.

Reply

hhhhfuckedagain May 22 2010, 13:17:38 UTC
idk where to put it though

cause she's done a lot of crazy shit for money

like diddling herself with one of Batman'sthe Knight's boomerangs while dressed as Robinthe Squire.

Reply

superxgrlfriend May 22 2010, 13:20:59 UTC
7 - totally fucked.

Reply


pacifisted May 22 2010, 13:13:51 UTC
What I think regarding this kid is too damn complex for the present question; unfortunately, this particular scale doesn't allow for recognizing multiple numbers across the table and/or anything terribly complicated all at the same time. I guess if I had to pin him down as something, I could... jeez, I really can't do this with only one number!

/facepalm

Just call him sitting around a 3/4 with heavy tendencies toward X if not actively drawn into something, and we'll let it sit at that.

Reply

superxgrlfriend May 22 2010, 13:18:07 UTC
The scale is definitely lacking, especially if your character (or you, really) is someone who views sexuality as something that's fluid/impossible to operationally define. And it really only works for one point in time or multiple points in time without allowing an overall type of analysis.

STILL IT'S ALL I COULD THINK OF AT 8AM WITHOUT BREAKING MY BRAIN WITH SCIENCE.

Reply

pacifisted May 22 2010, 13:23:29 UTC
No, hey, you're doing better at 8AM than I am, I assure you!

The scale's got its uses, to be sure; it's definitely a good way to get a fast overall picture when you need an analysis PDQ. And it's a hell of a lot easier than trying to determine the answer from loads and loads of heavy paragraphs and/or having to write them in the first place. My problem is just that I enjoy detailed information far too much, ahaha.

Reply

noelleno May 22 2010, 14:05:34 UTC
3/4 is a rather ironic number set to come to a conclusion with ain't it

Reply


agiftedmind May 22 2010, 13:17:45 UTC
.. Safeguard would be a three. Mind, I'm basing this off him as a five million year old robot in his robot body.

Not the 13-year old kid, who'd still be a 3. they are all the same anyways! And there's femmes who look like a mech, and mechs who look like a femme -

Umm - Personality based, then body-build based. At least for Safeguard.

Reply

superxgrlfriend May 22 2010, 13:21:46 UTC
I should have amended the scale to include a category for robosexual.

Reply

spacetimeguard May 22 2010, 13:38:52 UTC
Hahahaha.

<3

Reply

superxgrlfriend May 22 2010, 14:15:19 UTC
YOU KNOW IT'S KIND OF TRUE.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up