a picnic for stalkers

[wytchcroft]

Comments

[gunter_spb]

You started to look old Russian fiction? When waiting for a review? :)

[wytchcroft]

i was talking to a friend and this promptd me to get the book, now i am reading and soon the review, this week sometime!:)))

[wytchcroft]

you spoil me dear, you really do!:))

[wytchcroft]

you would like the novel of Solaris, i recommend it.
and i it will not be at all what you expect...

[wytchcroft]

you would like the novel of Solaris, i recommend it.
and it will not be at all what you expect.. it is very profound. a deep, deep work.

[wytchcroft]

ah well, i shall discover the truth of this when i read... but perhaps, theme, atmosphere? i shall see, i shall see. :)

[wytchcroft]

:)))

[stoshagownozad]

should be very interesting.
The Brothers were used to say the work on the story for the movie was really exhausting and that the movie and the book have little connections... but anyway indeed it became part of our minds - Stalker as depicted by Kaydanovsky... and the Zone as it became real thing after Chernobyl :(((

[wytchcroft]

have you read Tarkovsky's diaries??

they are full of shadows - but resolution also. Stalker seems to me, the same way. But he was not a natural positivist like the brothers seem to me (my view of course may change very soon!) :))

[viklamist]

Movie "Stalker" created after Chernobyl, but book "RoadSide picnic" will be writing before Chernobyl.
Sorry for my English.

[alek_morse]

You are wrong, movie "Stalker" was done before Chernobyl too, in 1979, but Chernobyl disaster that have been in 1986.

[mr_stapleton]

fascinating thing(s) - i like it!
start waiting for review :)

[wytchcroft]

have you read zone the poem by apollinaire??

[mr_stapleton]

not yet, but am going to :)
i like both film and book. film came first, but book penetrated also very deep.