Maintainer-only security level in communities

Jan 02, 2011 19:52


Title
Maintainer-only security level in communities

Short, concise description of the idea
Add an option to make posts in a community visible to maintainers only.

Full description of the ideaWhen posting to a community as a maintainer, it would be nice to have a security setting of maintainers-only instead of the just the current members and public ( Read more... )

§ under review, security levels, communities, community maintenance

Leave a comment

Comments 16

eurii January 9 2011, 22:33:15 UTC
most communities that need maintainer communication just make a 2nd community for the maintainers.

Reply

alexiel_rieth January 9 2011, 23:16:24 UTC
Another option I've seen is to make a special mod journal that only mods are given the password to.

Reply

lied_ohne_worte January 16 2011, 17:41:45 UTC
That's not really recommendable - LJ discourages the sharing of passwords to personal accounts.

Reply

charliemc January 9 2011, 23:22:15 UTC
Exactly. I've done that many times...

Reply


scien January 9 2011, 23:15:31 UTC
So much yes.

And it's not just about not wanting to communicate by email, it's about having a record available in a sensible place when mods change.

Reply


azurelunatic January 9 2011, 23:19:12 UTC
Since this exists on Dreamwidth, I can say practically speaking that another possible problem is having an important entry that's maintainers-only security being missed by the people who need to see it because there are so many other public or locked entries in the community, and it gets lost in the shuffle. Though one would solve this by creating a tag that is used on all maintainer-security entries, applying it at the time of posting and not after (because after does not send a notification), and asking all maintainers to subscribe to notifications for new entries with this tag.

It is implemented there by basically allowing private-security entries in communities and treating the maintainers as owners who are allowed to see private entries. Though I don't have more details than that.

Reply

foxfirefey January 9 2011, 23:34:27 UTC
Since there are security filters, I don't think there's any more/less likelihood on losing posts in the shuffle than there is in having a separate community. There's also the ability to make a new subscription for admins for admin only posts, which would help.

Reply

soph January 10 2011, 05:43:36 UTC
Does LJ have that ability, though? I didn't think you could subscribe to posts by security level on LJ.

Reply

foxfirefey January 10 2011, 06:38:29 UTC
I phrased wrong--I meant that LJ would have the ability to make such a new subscription, not that it already existed!

Reply


boredinsomniac July 1 2011, 16:00:10 UTC
This suggestion has been submitted for staff consideration.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up