006. [text]

Nov 04, 2010 00:11

Despite the favour I have for it, even I must admit that sometimes the word 'fool' is inadequate for fully demonstrating the complete and utter depths of another person's stupidity; previously, I would have thought that there were no words in this language or any other that would serve as suitable descriptor ( Read more... )

†: calisto yew, c: sirius black, c: larry butz, c: naruto uzumaki, c: adachi tohru, †: poison ivy, c: shihouin yoruichi, !: franziska von karma, †: claire bennet

Leave a comment

Comments 969

voice; walkthedawn November 3 2010, 13:20:05 UTC
[Nrrrr, pinged by 'lexicon', unfortunately.]

You and Minas should chat. He'd love to discuss rhetoric and he'd probably give you plenty of other words to use for people.

Reply

voice; dancing_pierrot November 3 2010, 13:24:37 UTC
That name seems familiar somehow. Perhaps we've spoken once before.

Reply


[text] caveatwalls November 3 2010, 13:28:23 UTC
I find the use of alliteration somewhat limiting to this.

Reply

[voice because typing all that out was tiring] dancing_pierrot November 3 2010, 13:31:15 UTC
As I said. It is only a preliminary creation. Or am I not allowed to have a particular fondness for a certain literary technique?

Reply

[voice] caveatwalls November 3 2010, 22:18:08 UTC
If you enjoy sounding cartoonish, feel free.

But usually idiot is sufficient.

Reply

[voice] dancing_pierrot November 4 2010, 00:46:19 UTC
Say, hypothetically, that you have two fools holding a conversation, one more stupid than the other; one calls the other an idiot -- how does the other participant respond?

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

voice | dancing_pierrot November 3 2010, 14:04:34 UTC
[Because Sirius said she couldn't do it, and we know what Franziska's like when you tell her you can't do something.]

Hmph. Did you have any contributions to make?

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

voice | dancing_pierrot November 3 2010, 14:11:33 UTC
Quite possibly 'subdolous slubberdegullion', although I rather do have a fondness for 'egregious egghead' as well. And surely you must have some manner of contribution to make?

Reply


[voice] atrumcanis November 3 2010, 14:06:11 UTC
Do I applaud or do I thank you or do I send flowers?

Reply

[voice] dancing_pierrot November 3 2010, 14:08:54 UTC
Hmph. I'm not expecting anything in return.

Reply

[voice] atrumcanis November 3 2010, 14:40:02 UTC
Even if I feel moved to do so? It is a rather lovely list. Exhaustive. I particularly like the alliteration, if I do say so myself; too many people ignore the beauty of a good alliterative phrase. A bit restricting, since it's caused you to leave off some particularly good ones--but I won't critique it right now!

Reply

[voice] dancing_pierrot November 3 2010, 14:45:02 UTC
You are, of course, free to contribute to it if you so wish.

Reply


[voice] unfeasible November 3 2010, 14:49:41 UTC
You've got too much time on your hands.

Reply

[voice] dancing_pierrot November 3 2010, 14:52:03 UTC
Excuse me?

Reply

unfeasible November 3 2010, 14:58:37 UTC
You're just sitting around make a stupid list of what to call stupid people? [sorry fran, this has just been the worst week ever and he's...well. bitter.]

Here's one: blathering bullshit.

Reply

dancing_pierrot November 3 2010, 15:03:01 UTC
[Hey, not all of us have super cool awesome powers that enable us to surpass security measures of major corporations 8(]

I was working.

And you contribution does not adhere to the formula.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up