Comments | sirenspull: 006. [text]

dancing_pierrot in sirenspull

006. [text]

Nov 04, 2010 00:11

Despite the favour I have for it, even I must admit that sometimes the word 'fool' is inadequate for fully demonstrating the complete and utter depths of another person's stupidity; previously, I would have thought that there were no words in this language or any other that would serve as suitable descriptor ( Read more... )

†: calisto yew, c: sirius black, c: larry butz, c: naruto uzumaki, c: adachi tohru, †: poison ivy, c: shihouin yoruichi, !: franziska von karma, †: claire bennet

Leave a comment

Back to all threads

[text] caveatwalls November 3 2010, 13:28:23 UTC

I find the use of alliteration somewhat limiting to this.

[voice because typing all that out was tiring] dancing_pierrot November 3 2010, 13:31:15 UTC

As I said. It is only a preliminary creation. Or am I not allowed to have a particular fondness for a certain literary technique?

[voice] caveatwalls November 3 2010, 22:18:08 UTC

If you enjoy sounding cartoonish, feel free.

But usually idiot is sufficient.

[voice] dancing_pierrot November 4 2010, 00:46:19 UTC

Say, hypothetically, that you have two fools holding a conversation, one more stupid than the other; one calls the other an idiot -- how does the other participant respond?

[voice] caveatwalls November 4 2010, 02:17:13 UTC

Nothing hypothetical about that. It's a daily occurrence. Typically the response is something foulmouthed. I would see no point in giving him ammunition precisely because he is an idiot.

[voice] dancing_pierrot November 4 2010, 02:32:31 UTC

Well, I dislike utilising coarse language.

Back to all threads

Leave a comment