As several of us here predicted last week, there are millions more Snape fans now than before Deathly Hallows opened worldwide. It's really awe-inspiring. I keep asking myself: "Is this my Fandom?" We've never felt as if we had the world on our side before, or even that the movie-makers had anything to say to us. Even people prepared to hate
(
Read more... )
Comments 34
Reply
It was a good movie, but overall I think I preferred Snape's final scene in the book over the one in the movie.
Reply
Harry's father-figure situation reminds me of characters like Perseus in mythology who have a distant god-like Zeus for a father. The Dad watches over from afar but doesn't interact. And at first that is true for both James and Snape. James is merely a spirit, while Snape stays away from the Dursleys.
But once Harry gets to Hogwarts, Snape acts as the stern father-figure who tells him the blunt truth (about most things) and who has high expectations. Harry doesn't really need another soft-fuzzy Father Figure. He had enough of those who expected nothing from Harry. Even Dumbledore doesn't push Harry until he absolutely has to do it.
Reply
I totally agree. Don't get me wrong, I'm really thrilled with the film and especially with Alan Rickman's performance -- if I wasn't already, I'd fall in love with both him and Sev all over again ;) -- but part of me doesn't quite understand why it is only now, through the film, that people begin to understand and appreciate the true nature of Snape's character. I mean, it's all there, in the books, pretty much spelled out in a sequences of scenes more complete and possibly even more heartwrenching than the selection shown in the film ... !
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
No, because Harry called forth the man he thought was his father.
Just to make it clear, I'm not a proponent of this theory!
Reply
Not necessarily. The people Harry calls to him with the Resurrection Stone are people for whom he feels familial love, in one way or another. It's quite logical that Severus isn't among them, even if the beginnings of respect for the man are percolating in Harry's brain at this point.
Reply
I think James and Lily were already under threat of being attacked and killed by Voldemort. Voldemort would have attacked them, because
1) They were already targets since they were Order members and they fought Voldmeort three times and lived to tell the tale;
2) Peter would have betrayed them anyway; it was only a question of when and not if.
3) The Prophecy Snape took to Voldemort only made it sooner rather than later imo.
======================
I think James was a bit disconnected too; Harry barely looked at him; his body language I felt was a lot more positive towards Sirius and even Remus, than James (or than it should have been towards James). I think it was the effect of the Prince's Tale, which Harry had just come out of. :)
Reply
Too bad they didn't repeat SWM; that would have made the disconnect more reasonable (that's not the word I'm looking for but I'm having a sr. moment).
Reply
Reply
Priya: I agree!
Reply
Reply
Those are good questions, but they wouldn't fit too well in the scene, LOL.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I thought the "always" line echoed by Lily was powerful and I noticed it immediately. I also enjoyed Harry and Dumbledore's chat at Kings Cross, where Harry talks to Dumbledore about Snape and Lily's matching patronus.
I just would have liked it if they would have put in Dumbledore's backstory. I imagine fans who haven't read the book were a little confused.
Reply
Leave a comment