I posted last night about having timeable but mostly painless contractions. They became painful and were 2.5 minutes apart for two hours so hubby and I braved the blizzard and went to L&D as per doctor (and LJ) instructions.
Only then the contractions went back to being painless and the monitors weren't picking up most of them. Sigh.
She did an
(
Read more... )
Comments 20
I'm due on Tuesday and am loathe to go to the hospital until the absolute last second, but there's no way to no if my instinct will amount to any dilation once I get there!
If its any consolation I hear that non-first time moms should err on the side of going in sooner rather than later.
Reply
I think I've heard that too about second babies. I just don't wanna like deliver her in the living room or something lol but I also really don't wanna spend four hours a week at L&D!
Reply
Reply
Reply
In my experience, I would say to expect labor soonish, as I gave birth 5 days after the false labor incident. My labor was quick too. I started contractions at 11am on Christmas Day 2010 (39wks 3days gestation) and my DS2 was born at 1:56 pm. The labor was so quick I had a natural birth and I almost didn't make it to the hospital. Yay precipitous births.
Good Luck!
Reply
but wow that's definitely a quick active labor! and aww Christmas day!!
Reply
With my first, I had false labour several times *before* my due date, and then I went to 42 weeks with him. It can mean real labour is close to starting or not, it depends on your body.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
With my second daughter, I only had 1 cervical exam... at which point I was 42 weeks, in true active labor for 5 hours, and turned out I was 8cm ;)
Real contractions are undeniably real labor. You will know the difference!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment