Sorry writer, but all you're writing is an original character. I also don't agree with your one writer that this is how Rowling would write the story particularly regarding Ron. Rowling wouldn't have placed Hermione into this situation in the first place. If she had covered the subject of a character finding out they were not Muggleborn but something else it's doubtful she would have used Hermione as she's supposed to symbolize a Muggleborn can do anything a Wizard can, and she would be more likely to use a brand new character. If she had used Hermione she would have also kept her in character and wouldn't turn her into a bad ass. Correction... she wouldn't turn Hermione into this writer's definition of bad ass because Hermione is already bad ass
And Ron represents that not all wizards care about blood. Ron's not going to think Hermione's a completely different person, just because she learned her parents aren't her birth parents. Then again, this subscribes to the all-too-common theory that if you learn your birth parents aren't who you thought they were, you do become a different person.
Also, Malfoy's not going to suddenly like Hermione, just because he can't call her a mudblood anymore. He can't call Ron or Harry mudbloods, but he still hates them.
Comments 2
Reply
Then again, this subscribes to the all-too-common theory that if you learn your birth parents aren't who you thought they were, you do become a different person.
Also, Malfoy's not going to suddenly like Hermione, just because he can't call her a mudblood anymore. He can't call Ron or Harry mudbloods, but he still hates them.
Reply
Leave a comment