Here is day five. I checked my inbox yesterday and found this bit of
wank.
TITLE:
Queen of the HuntPERPETRATOR:
YuriFanGirl15SUE-O-METER:
COVER/BANNER ART: It is a clip of their avatar. I haven't a clue what it is supposed to be of.
FULL NAME: Hermione, Minerva, Bellatrix and Fleur
SPECIES: Hermione is some kind of royalty. She's also a
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
While the anonymous reviewer didn't need to use the language they did I've always found works that do go this AU to be insulting to not just the original creator but the person doing the writing. If you're creative enough to come up with something this original, why aren't you writing original fiction. Some AUs don't honestly work without the canon characters, but this... this one isn't one of those. That author's note chapter also really bothers me.
These are "year chapters" and are meant to skip over dialogue that isn't relative to important events. It is going to only be like this for now.Um... here's the thing. You shouldn't be just covering the important events. Just because something isn't a major event, or one of the important events doesn't mean it isn't important to the story. A writer needs to progress from one important event to another, not just throw them at the reader. Otherwise ( ... )
Reply
......
After a long moment with brain bleach, I came to decision that professor McGonagall deserves more love. She rocks! And she is widow so she's free to have some mature romance in her life. Just pretty please, don't pair her with her teenager students. That's gross. And Dumbledore is off limits too, for obvious reasons. I suppose I have to to dredge up the Pit if there are any good Minerva fics.
Hermione's harem aside (it isn't reverse harem , is it?) there isn't much originality. It feels like a mismatch of crossovers, allusions and clichés from western fantasy stock.
Reply
A harem for females is called a reverse harem. And yeah... it does feel very mismatched on the writers part.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment