3529: Off We Go - Nick Johnson

[pottersues]

- The link of the day is Writing: Is my OC a Mary-Sue.
- Flashback Sue

I am not finished with Alphabet Days, but needed something fast to post for today.

TITLE: Off We GO
PERPETRATOR: SpiritGuaridan108
SUE-O-METER:
COVER/BANNER ART: random pencil sketch of someone
SUMMARY:”When you're chosen to take a journey through the multi-verse, what do

Comments

[vervainwolf]

One grudging point for being upfront about "snatching up" special abilities.

Negative ten bazillion for this. Most of the DMs I know wouldn't tolerate this kind of Munchin min-maxing. More than one of them would also take the abilities as a blatant challenge and make sure that whatever he ran into would JUST SO HAPPEN to perfectly counter whatever he chose.
Then again, most of the DMs I know consider the game about storytelling, not the players killing everything they come across for the lulz.

[yemi_hikari]

My brother throws a fit at the very idea of allowing such abilities into an RP he did, and actually found himself doing this to his friend's evil Gary Stu - that is also posted to the net as I made the mistake of answering our friend's question on what I was doing - fanfic stuff, and he instantly thought it was a great way to share his amazing character to the entire world. I eventually got through to him when I shared with him an article on Bella Swan being a Mary Sue, as he liked the series, and then he asked if was alright to still like Twilight, and I said of course - you can still like something despite the fact it's not realistic.

[cal_yn]

You can't grab the Wandless Magic ability because THERE IS NO WANDLESS MAGIC ABILITY. *facepalm* Animagus and Occlumency take WORK, they're not inborn talents. And there is DEFINITELY no such thing as a Technomage.

Metamorphamagus, even though it's the actual spelling, will never look or sound right to me. I always want to drop the third M, making it Metamorphagus.

These last two entries seem to be labeled in the 2000s instead of the 3000s, was that intentional?

[pottersues]

That was accidental on my part, the 2000's instead of the 3000's.

[zoya52]

There is a thing called wandless magic. J. K. has shown it many times in her books. There is even a school that teaches wandless magic. For more reference check the Harry Potter Wikipedia.

[pottersues]

True, but one can say that canon wandless magic and fanon wandless magic are two different things. Rowling makes it clear that being able to do wandless magic is a sign of major control in a particular area, while fanon tends to make it out as some rare trait that is naturally born into the wizard - which can pretty much be summed up as "they don't have to work for it".

[darth_gojira]

AGGGGGH THIS IS LIKE READY PLAYER ONE ONLY WORSE