Boggle

Nov 05, 2010 12:56

I read this comment in an article about SCA feast planning ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 27

mmy_me November 5 2010, 00:32:25 UTC
eel = weird? I join you in boggle world.

Reply

pepperbeast November 5 2010, 01:17:49 UTC
Yeah... go figure. I'd be pretty thrilled if I have eels to serve at a feast, even if we only had them broiled.

Reply

slothphil November 5 2010, 05:38:45 UTC
They can doubtless be got -- there's commercial eeling at Lake Ellesmere.

Reply

pepperbeast November 5 2010, 06:40:06 UTC
I think it all goes into those teeny packets of smoked eel and the like.

Reply


wldrose November 5 2010, 01:04:28 UTC
I dont agree, but there sure as heck is a place for it at and in most feasts. (I would say at least here in the east perhaps 20% would be mad for it and another 30-50 would try it) but the service vs art on feasts is a big thing

ash

Reply

lady_guenievre November 5 2010, 03:06:09 UTC
Honestly, it's (to me) just a matter of where in the feast you put it - if you fill people mostly up first, then add eel, it's all good..

Reply

wldrose November 5 2010, 03:07:53 UTC
that would be what i would do but hey a feast evetn go for it

Reply

pepperbeast November 5 2010, 03:08:30 UTC
Why would I fill them up *before* serving something really nice?

Reply


nos911 November 5 2010, 02:04:05 UTC
I now have a massive craving for smoked eels.

Reply

pepperbeast November 5 2010, 02:53:05 UTC
Ditto... and I'm mentally making up recipes for an eel pate.

Reply

nos911 November 5 2010, 03:27:35 UTC
I came up with a smoked fish paste idea/recipe last night when I couldn't sleep. I now have to go buy some smoked mackerel.

Reply

pepperbeast November 5 2010, 06:42:17 UTC
Yum... I could almost see my way clear to a seafood feast if there were smoked mackerel involved.

Reply


raventhourne November 5 2010, 04:59:16 UTC
I can see the advice to be a general statement of "don't make every item odd" but not a blanket statement about the entire thing.

I think every feast should feature something that not everyone might have tried, or had the opportunity to try and boy I'd love to be served eel.

nom...nom...eel...hmmm.

Reply

slothphil November 5 2010, 05:57:21 UTC
I've successfully served chicken livers in an egg sauce at a feast (Scully's recipe in Early French Cookery for the Viandier's Menus Droits). Just a small dish for each table in one course so people could skip it in favour of more traditional feast fare without feeling under-fed. People tried it, several came to tell me they liked it.

I think that if a cook is trusted to produce good food, they can serve up damned near anything from the mediæval recipe corpus and have a reasonable proportion of people taste it.

Reply

raventhourne November 5 2010, 06:12:35 UTC
You and I are in violent agreement.

You phrased it much better

Reply

pepperbeast November 5 2010, 06:38:28 UTC
I think that's about right. xanthe_selkie points out that you can spot the SCAdians at a social gathering around here by the way they stuff food into their mouths and *then* ask what it is.

Reply


alexandralynch November 5 2010, 05:07:06 UTC
Eel is not much appreciated here in the midwest, but that is changing slowly. I blame the fact that most of us over a certain age grew up seeing fish on our plates as either salmon cakes, tuna surprise, or fried.

I always try to make sure the food I serve is not too "weird". Though I have a recipe that turns out what looks like purple barbecued chicken, and it is highly popular. (Chicken braised in pomegranate sauce)

Reply

pepperbeast November 5 2010, 06:35:48 UTC
I see the principle of the thing, but I also tend to think that most of the stuff that appears in the Medieval/Renaissance corpus is perfectly recognisable food made of relatively ordinary ingredients.

I also had a very fried fish/salmon cakes/tuna casserole experience of fish as a child, but I got over it. Truth be told, I still *like* salmon cakes. and fried fish can go down well enough at a feast, if it's carefully done.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up