They aren't that different, though. That's why all kosher meat is halal. I think it's mostly the prayers said over the meat that's different in the long run.
I'm not an expert on the issue, but I swear I feel like some animal rights groups actually said halal/kosher methods were safer and overall more ethical? Correct me if I'm wrong.
It's supposed to be the done with a perfect, sharp knife that makes a deep cut across the neck and kills the animal basically instantly. Much like old school chicken slaughter you here old relatives talk about, you know "when I was your age we took the chicken out and in one hard swing...". It's very intense training though, and to get real ortho certification, you're not half assing it.
I thought that kashrut and halal required a humane method of slaughter. . .
Is a quick slit throat by a sharp knife really less humane than "stunning" animals with captive bolt pistols (guns that punch holes in the animal's skull, which often are employed incorrectly and leave the animals alive on the slaughtering line), or with electricity, which we are assured is painless (I remain skeptical).
Comments 105
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Is a quick slit throat by a sharp knife really less humane than "stunning" animals with captive bolt pistols (guns that punch holes in the animal's skull, which often are employed incorrectly and leave the animals alive on the slaughtering line), or with electricity, which we are assured is painless (I remain skeptical).
Reply
Reply
They do, and that's the point.
The reasons they're giving for this ban are bullshit.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment