Leave a comment

Comments 33

liliaeth July 2 2016, 10:17:50 UTC
Wanna bet that if any of this actually happens, that it has more to do with Warren than with Sanders; Because Warren actually is intelligent and able to work with people, whereas Sanders very much isn't.

Reply

backincharge July 2 2016, 10:28:03 UTC
I feel like all of this is to make Warren as VP look more natural for Hillary if she runs on a similar platform that Warren runs on. It would be so awkward for Hillary to reject these proposals and then go for Warren as VP.

Reply

liliaeth July 2 2016, 10:34:14 UTC
But see, there's the thing, right now, Warren has a lot of potential influence on Hillary. I'm pretty sure that she was able to make a few demands, even just to get her to endorse and support her at public events. The fact that a lot of people are eying her as a potential VP is just a bonus to that.

If it was just Sanders, Hillary could easily ignore him, because well... she's already way ahead of Trump in the polls, even without Sanders' endorsement. At this point, he's more of a hinder than an asset.

Reply

tabaqui July 2 2016, 13:58:30 UTC
Exactly.

Reply


meadowphoenix July 2 2016, 15:49:58 UTC
These are a questionable definitions of victories (like name and shame, if Clinton people were proposing other things what were they? I know Clinton's people wanted a lower minimum threshhold, but "well if we get $15 we do, if we don't we don't" is not a victory, lmao), but that platform looks basic, lol dems okay.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up