how dare you complain to me

Jan 09, 2007 22:13

I've added "Greg Grunberg: zombie wrangler" to my LJ interests, and I think you should, too.

***

House

spoilers )

greg grunberg: zombie wrangler, tv: house

Leave a comment

Comments 29

froda_baggins January 10 2007, 03:16:01 UTC
I think Hugh Laurie himself hit the nail on the head when he said that the main character in a TV show never really changes or evolves.

they need to stop this "won five Golden Globe NOMINATIONS" bullshit.

I had the exact same thought! I think it's some stupid PR thing to confuse people into thinking that's how many it actually WON.

Reply

musesfool January 10 2007, 03:18:51 UTC
I think Hugh Laurie himself hit the nail on the head when he said that the main character in a TV show never really changes or evolves.

I think that's true of a certain type of show, of which "House" is one, but I don't agree it's true across the board.

I think it's some stupid PR thing to confuse people into thinking that's how many it actually WON.

*nod*

And at first it was working, but now it just pisses me off.

Reply

froda_baggins January 10 2007, 03:19:58 UTC
Well, yeah, a generalization by its nature won't apply to EVERYTHING being generalized about. But yes. XD

Reply

musesfool January 10 2007, 15:08:37 UTC
;p

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

musesfool January 10 2007, 03:37:21 UTC
I hated the hug, but I liked that she was up in House's face about the patient. I wish she'd stop being so passive-aggressive.

I loved the end. I loved that nothing changes.

I didn't want anything to change, but I feel like the show dicked me around for a stretch of episodes, possibly because I thought the whole storyline was DUMB, because OF COURSE House needs the Vicodin, and I don't understand why Cuddy and Wilson have a problem with that. So it was kind of a waste of an arc to me.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

musesfool January 10 2007, 04:00:03 UTC
I get the sense that Wilson feels like he SHOULD have a problem with it.

*nod*

But it's just weird for him as an oncologist - I mean, doesn't he prescribe pain medication for his patients who live with excruciating pain? Or is that so many of those patients don't make it, so he can feel like he's just making them comfortable, and not making them addicts? Either way, it's kind of a huge hypocrisy on his part.

Reply


kindkit January 10 2007, 03:24:30 UTC
I actually watched this episode of House (and the previous new episode from before Christmas) because I'd been hearing about this arc and wanted to see how it turned out.

Well, basically it made me glad I don't watch the show anymore. The waffling on whether House is or is not a drug addict (as opposed to someone with CHRONIC PAIN who needs drugs to FUNCTION, DAMMIT) was super annoying. (Pardon the asscaps, but it makes me feel all frustrated and asscappy.) The last minute attempt at redeeming that dickhead Tritter was even more super annoying. And the fall of the House/Wilson friendship into cliche and predictability, when it used to be so fascinating (at least waaaay back in the early episodes of the first season) was a double order of Extra Super Annoying with Special Annoying Sauce on the side.

Reply

musesfool January 10 2007, 03:38:44 UTC
Well, yes, I have a huge problem with all this "House is a JUNKIE" nonsense, because it's such bullshit and I hate that they keep pulling it out instead of just resolving that, no, House is IN PAIN and the drugs are pain management. Jesus.

Reply

lyricalnights January 10 2007, 04:13:42 UTC
That's what always amazes me, like these are supposedly medical professionals. One, in fact, is a cancer specialist, which just screams "deal with pain management" and they... don't get the concept of chronic pain? Not that House isn't a dick or doesn't rely too much on self-medication and isolating sarcasm, but there's this huge middle ground that the writers either can't or won't see.

Love love love the show, but that whole area just makes me wanna throw things.

Reply

musesfool January 10 2007, 15:10:55 UTC
Not that House isn't a dick or doesn't rely too much on self-medication and isolating sarcasm, but there's this huge middle ground that the writers either can't or won't see.

Love love love the show, but that whole area just makes me wanna throw things.

Exactly.

I mean, I understand that in real life, some doctors *do* have trouble with chronic narcotic use for pain management, because of the addictiveness, but even so! Wilson's an oncologist! He should be more knowledgeable and less judgemental about pain management than he appears to be. Gah!

It just smacks of the writers wanting to ratchet up the drama but without providing any real change or resolution to the so-called problem.

Reply


starrysummer January 10 2007, 03:29:33 UTC
Okay, what I want to know is how exactly Cuddy owns House now. Yes, she fabricated the evidence that got him off, but if she contradicts that, she's perjured herself. Is there something I'm missing (besides the last episode, when I didn't have cable *glares at Time Warner*? Because I love the idea of Cuddy controlling him for once, I just don't quite get how it works when House is the shifty bastard he is.

Reply

musesfool January 10 2007, 03:39:55 UTC
Well, she perjured herself *for him* so he owes her.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

musesfool January 10 2007, 04:01:16 UTC
Right. He might feel he has to repay her at least a little for putting herself out for him.

Reply


thepiratequeen January 10 2007, 03:29:50 UTC
In other news, that was Dwayne Wayne as House's lawyer. *feels old*

Seriously? Wow, I did not recognize him at all.

Reply

musesfool January 10 2007, 03:40:29 UTC
Yeah. I'm also pretty sure I saw his name in the credits.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up