Anakin is displeased.ladyhadhafangOctober 20 2012, 20:39:31 UTC
Seriously! How do you get that wrong?
I really wish they had gone with someone like Vaklu for the episode. Especially considering that Vaklu wasn't out for petty power or things like that; he (and Tobin) honestly thought that he was doing what was best for his homeplanet (which, of course...you're dealing with the Sith. What do you think is going to happen?). Honestly, I think if the king had allied himself with Dooku because he thought that Onderon had lost its past after it had blended into the Republic, because he wanted Onderon to take back what was theirs...not only would it be a nice callback to KOTOR II, it would be a hell of a lot more powerful. But nope -- we got Snidely Fucking Whiplash. Brilliant. /sarcasm.
Re: Anakin is displeased.ladyhadhafangOctober 20 2012, 20:59:48 UTC
Well, glad you found it amusing at any rate. :)
*Sighs*
But really, I agree. I mean, while EFES (Evil For Evil's Sake) villains can be done right, they're so often made one-dimensional. And maybe some people off-LJ are okay with one-dimensional villains (and I guess they may have their reasons), but I'm not. It's just not interesting and it's not good storytelling. In fact, I believe there's a quote somewhere from Dean Koontz that says a lot about how I feel about villains: "The best villains are those that evoke pity and sometimes even genuine sympathy as well as terror. Think of the pathetic aspect of the Frankenstein monster. Think of the poor werewolf, hating what he becomes in the light of the full moon, but incapable of resisting the lycanthropic tides in his own cells."
Okay, I first found it quoted in PLOT AND STRUCTURE by James Scott Bell (definitely give it a read, by the way! :D It's definitely helped me in my own writing), but yeah. You get the idea. :)
Comments 21
Reply
I really wish they had gone with someone like Vaklu for the episode. Especially considering that Vaklu wasn't out for petty power or things like that; he (and Tobin) honestly thought that he was doing what was best for his homeplanet (which, of course...you're dealing with the Sith. What do you think is going to happen?). Honestly, I think if the king had allied himself with Dooku because he thought that Onderon had lost its past after it had blended into the Republic, because he wanted Onderon to take back what was theirs...not only would it be a nice callback to KOTOR II, it would be a hell of a lot more powerful. But nope -- we got Snidely Fucking Whiplash. Brilliant. /sarcasm.
Reply
LOL!!
Evil for ebul's sake is too easy. There is a way to do it, but so few get it right.
Reply
*Sighs*
But really, I agree. I mean, while EFES (Evil For Evil's Sake) villains can be done right, they're so often made one-dimensional. And maybe some people off-LJ are okay with one-dimensional villains (and I guess they may have their reasons), but I'm not. It's just not interesting and it's not good storytelling. In fact, I believe there's a quote somewhere from Dean Koontz that says a lot about how I feel about villains: "The best villains are those that evoke pity and sometimes even genuine sympathy as well as terror. Think of the pathetic aspect of the Frankenstein monster. Think of the poor werewolf, hating what he becomes in the light of the full moon, but incapable of resisting the lycanthropic tides in his own cells."
Okay, I first found it quoted in PLOT AND STRUCTURE by James Scott Bell (definitely give it a read, by the way! :D It's definitely helped me in my own writing), but yeah. You get the idea. :)
Reply
But yes, anywho. I agree with you on...practically everything. I'm not spoiling anything, but the general actually presents good dynamics on morals.
Reply
And agreed, so very much! :D
Reply
Leave a comment