On Nobodies and emotions

Apr 18, 2007 17:51

I know what you're thinking...uh oh, it's one of those rants again! Actually, not so, it's more discussion/theory than actual rant. So feel free to throw around your own ideas, too. :3

Ramble under here! )

speculation, canon, organization

Leave a comment

Comments 28

lanjelin April 19 2007, 13:59:01 UTC
I applaud you, madam! A very believable theory that works with canon.

Reply


maeda April 19 2007, 14:55:07 UTC
I dig that idea.

Reply


akino_ame April 19 2007, 16:02:03 UTC
Nice one. It really sounds like the best explanation I've heard so far. It just really sucks that Nomura didn't explain this well enough. But in any case, you get Stitch with duckies.

Reply

lynxgriffin April 19 2007, 19:50:46 UTC
Hooray, Stitch with duckies! XD

Reply


therealkaichan April 19 2007, 17:32:25 UTC
I'm loving this theory like I never loved a nobody theory ever.

I really really do, it goes along with lots of things that I thought before, and it is perfectly worded, I'm memo-ing this post for future reference, thanks for sharing T_T

Reply

lynxgriffin April 19 2007, 19:51:31 UTC
And hey, thanks for memo-ing! :D

Reply


urban_idyll April 19 2007, 19:38:07 UTC
people have mistaken Axel saying things like "I would miss you" as "I would miss you because I care about you" as opposed to the more accurate "I miss you because you make me happy."This is how I always interpreted the way Axel is with Roxas, as well. I previously thought that nobodies had an emotional response to things, but were unable to interpret their own emotions because of the lack of a heart, which is why they appear to act emotionally sometimes, even if it's a seemingly inappropriate emotion for the situation. I always thought that Roxas could have stirred up any emotion in Axel (and for whatever reason), but he interpreted the emotion as affection/friendly feelings because it was a happy event for him to feel anything at all ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up