Take away one lace-weave wig, add one katana mix thoroughly

Jun 07, 2009 10:50

The mods at noscans_daily have posted a clarification and update to the rules of the community vis a vis calling people out on their privilege. Summation? "This is not a safe space." No, they actually say that in the post itself - they will not make NS_D a safe space for those discussions to occur. Otherwise, it's a spectacular case of epic tl;dring that ( Read more... )

music, rl, racism, dreams, fuckwittery, you ain't no picasso, fashion, failures in diversity, scans daily, you tube, japan mockery

Leave a comment

Comments 27

insanitykun June 7 2009, 19:51:42 UTC
AAA PEEEEEEEEEN!!

Ensoku are actually on Emiru/Run from Lareine's label!

Reply

kali921 June 7 2009, 20:00:23 UTC
Is that Maple Kiss Productions? I'm confused!

Reply

insanitykun June 7 2009, 20:06:37 UTC
Yep!

Reply

kali921 June 7 2009, 20:34:10 UTC
Who else is on Maple Kiss now? Anyone worth doing a happy dance over?

Reply


lyssie June 7 2009, 19:58:05 UTC
Meh. I was only ever a member of SD because it was occasionally interesting. The comms that have sprung up after are even less appealing.

Reply

kali921 June 7 2009, 20:03:15 UTC
I still feel the loss of the simple size of S_D 1.0 and all the wonderful material that was posted and archived over the years. The new communities haven't really produced the level of meta analysis that I miss from the old S_D. There's occasionally good stuff to be found, but it's mostly "here, have four pages from War of Kings #2," and not much else. However, S_D 2.0 DID turn me on to the Captain Raptor books, and that alone makes it worthwhile.

Reply

outlawpoet June 8 2009, 04:46:50 UTC
It makes me sad every time I see a link to the old SD and see that "deleted" screen. It's amazing how many blogs, lj's, facebook conversations, and emails I have that reference a set of scans on old SD, or some comments on there, or even just a commentary post. It's truly a chunk of history that's been lost to us.

Reply

kali921 June 8 2009, 14:45:33 UTC
Mottoed. It also still reminds me of my own part in the nuking, and it's not a good feeling. :-(

Reply


lienne June 7 2009, 20:08:46 UTC
Summation? "This is not a safe space." No, they actually say that in the post itself - they will not make NS_D a safe space for those discussions to occur.

...I dunno, am I missing something here? 'Cause the post you linked kind of reads as "Shit, guys! We finally noticed somebody dumped radioactive waste all over our community the other day, and in a demonstration of epic failure to get the point, we shook our modly fingers at the people trying to clean it up. So this is what we're doing to try and prevent that kind of shit from happening again, and in the meantime, wear lead suits."

Edit: No, this was the icon I wanted.

Reply

kali921 June 7 2009, 20:37:10 UTC
Yes, there's an apology and "mea culpa" in that post by the mod(s). The problem is the inherent contradiction in their endless threading last week about how yes, NS_D is an anti-racist/sexist/homophobia/ablist comm and we'll figure out a way to make it so! Then today we get an admission of "well, no, it's not a safe space, SRY2SAY."

I do, however, give them points for at least being finally honest about the fact that they don't seem to have the ability or patience to make it a safe space. Now people know whether or not it's a safe space - at least that's clear.

There's still also a great deal of ambiguity, as I said above, as to how discussions about various isms should proceed. That leaves plenty of room for arbitrary modding without consistency.

Reply

lienne June 7 2009, 20:45:05 UTC
Granted that I haven't seen the original comments you describe, and therefore am speaking from a position of ignorance, the first explanation that occurs to me for that contradiction is: since making those comments they have figured out they can't, or don't know how to, do the safe-space-making job properly.

Edit: I can't type. And I'm going to go away now, because I am tired and likely to say stupid things.

Reply

kali921 June 8 2009, 14:44:20 UTC
Granted that I haven't seen the original comments you describe, and therefore am speaking from a position of ignorance, the first explanation that occurs to me for that contradiction is: since making those comments they have figured out they can't, or don't know how to, do the safe-space-making job properly.

I agree - that's exactly what they're saying.

Reply


Oh, silly me and my enter button. This is what I meant to say. scottyquick June 7 2009, 22:47:54 UTC
I think what rabican skalja is saying is that Scans Daily can't ensure that discriminatory comments won't be made, which is what a safe space can. The mods are actively encouraging calling people on prejudiced bs, in order to make it a safer space, but they can't promise they won't be made. Personal attacks are against the rule, and I'd imagine something that targeted you personally such as a racist comment would count.

Reply

Re: Oh, silly me and my enter button. This is what I meant to say. filbypott June 8 2009, 04:01:30 UTC
That's pretty much what I took away from it.

Reply

Re: Oh, silly me and my enter button. This is what I meant to say. outlawpoet June 8 2009, 04:51:36 UTC
Well, there's also the subtext of 'safe spaces' which are essentially capable of completely denying access to people who threaten the highlighted minorities or interest groups. For better or for worse, SD2.0 and noscans_daily seem to have decided they like being the "general" comm for comics discussion, rather than the minority-safe one.

I can't say that I'd rather they go one way or the other. but I agree that you can't be a general comics forum and also provide a safe space for any minority or identity group, because privilige and bigotry do in fact exist, and comics fandom, small as it is, still has a mainstream, and you can't have it without accepting this. Providing a safe space within any fandom would mean banning a fair number of people, and SD 2.0 is apparently meant to embrace wider fandoms, rather than be a girl-run slash community(which might have a chance at running a safe space).

Reply

Re: Oh, silly me and my enter button. This is what I meant to say. kali921 June 8 2009, 14:43:47 UTC
I responded in detail to other commenters below. Hopefully that will clarify.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

kali921 June 8 2009, 14:38:11 UTC
Do it! To the gym with thee!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up