Obamacare's Passed -- Now What?
Introduction
Obamacare has now passed the House, and will almost certainly also pass the Senate. That is the worst of it. Now, let's think about what this means,
( What does it MEAN? )
Obamacare has now passed the House, and will almost certainly also pass the Senate. That is the worst of it. Now, let's think about what this means,
( What does it MEAN? )
Comments 68
Ran across something that could help repeal: Put a Republican majority in at least the House. zero out all appropriations to fund the bill. Give the Senate and the White House the choice of that or no budget.
Reply
Go Washington State style.
Do everything by mail.
Stuff the mail.
Once everything is removed from traceable IDs....you can't prove a thing.
Reply
Reply
I make a habit of using "actual reason."
I know you're angry at the world for your lot in life (would you like me to go into that here?), ...
I'm not particularly "angry at the world" for my "lot in life." I'm more than a little angry at myself for my own mistakes.
... and you have... shall we say... interesting views about people from other countries and races...
Such as?
But a teabagger?
A "teabagger" is a man who puts his testicles in another man's mouth, an act which has has nothing to do with national health care policy. Since I do not place my testicles in such a position, I am not a "teabagger."
I do, however, basically agree with the Tea Partiers. Was that what you meant?
C'mon. Should I remind you that the government health care that you're so much against is something you've used? In fact, I would be very surprised to find that you're not using it right now.
I'd be very surprised, as Obamacare has not yet gone into effect. If you mean government-subsidized ( ... )
Reply
Reply
I was never a big fan of Mitt Romney. But the big difference here was that Mitt Romney's proposal was never close to passage. There was little point expending energy opposing something that was very much still at the stage of a tentative proposal.
What you're doing is called: LYING.
No. It's called "disagreeing with you." There was a time when even the Left was able to grasp the concept of honest disagreement, though that time seems to be over.
It's something a lot of TEABAGGERS do. And yes, that's what they've been calling themselves, at least until some of them realized what kind of sexual innuendo they were making.
I do not remember the Tea Party people calling themselves "teabaggers." What's more, since it is a disgusting sexual innuendo, and it is not what they call themselves, your use of that term is essentially an attempt at ad hominem, and is understood by me as being so, and as a tacit admission of the lack ( ... )
Reply
( ... )
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment