Hilarious Racefailiness

Oct 28, 2009 23:51

Check these mooks out ...

http://shemale.livejournal.com/158602.html

I'm not sure who is funnier. shemale for its repulsive name and icons and all-caps shouting, or doombinis for the earnest lecture about how all white people need to feel guilty for "strucutral racism ( Read more... )

racism, political correctness, meta

Leave a comment

Comments 209

(The comment has been removed)

shemale October 29 2009, 19:51:21 UTC
And then you took me off because your lust for trannies was making you uncomfortable and you felt that i was to blame.

Heh.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

shemale October 29 2009, 20:08:34 UTC
Quoting game shows makes you sound intelligent, it's just a fact.

Reply


kc_anathema October 29 2009, 07:09:28 UTC
Wow, the entitlement is strong with that bunch. Think the way they think or else be labelled various pc-smears by their capslock of doom. I always admire how you can walk into those echo chambers and keep it at the level of simply decimating their arguments. When all they can do is shout insults at you, you know their own reasoning is not only lacking, but they must know it, too. Otherwise they'd try to smack you down their own arguments.

I think they shout to cover the sound of the crickets that make up their audience.

Reply


juliet_winters October 29 2009, 07:24:45 UTC
yeah, it's really a sign of a great argument when they break out the pornographic icons.
Why I don't want my kids to hang out with the out and about gay community...well, it could be that. Everything's sexualized.

Reply

jordan179 October 29 2009, 16:16:34 UTC
There is definitely an element in the LGBT community which is sexually obsessive, which goes "It's ok for us to be gay so we're going to rant on and on and on about sex all the time!" This attitude is adolescent, and it's weird when it emnates from chronological adults.

Reply

Jordan... juliet_winters October 29 2009, 17:21:09 UTC
There are a LOT of perpetual three-year-olds out there in sexually-active adult bodies. Trust me on that one; I'm a Baby Boomer.

My writing partner (literary_equine) told me once about a psych test given astronaut candidates in the pre-Woodstock era. It was 100 statements to complete, all starting with "I am...", and the statements could not repeat.

Most of the test-takers pooped out or started repeating somewhere between 30 and 40. With one major exception: when the same test was given to identified homosexuals (presumably at a later time, after "the LGBT community" started coming out), many of them couldn't get beyond 10, and all of those had to do with their sexual orientation. Now THAT's obsessive -- just like the Jack Chick tract about "those homos", they were identifying themselves ENTIRELY by their sexual behavior. Like they were just this set of gonads without anybody attached to them. That can't be healthy.

Reply

Re: Jordan... juliet_winters December 21 2009, 23:17:50 UTC
Of course that would have nothing to do with society defining them by their sexual behavior!

And really, you're going to cite Jack Chick? Really?

Reply


typewriterking October 29 2009, 07:28:55 UTC
I'm one of those half-breeds, so their rules must be complicated. I easily "pass" for white, so maybe I'm supposed to feel the guilt of being born in white privilege. On the other hand, I'm a Choctaw living within the twelve counties of Oklahoma that my ancestors were force-marched to in the Trail of Tears (so I have absolute moral authority!).

So, am I guilty white for "passing", or am I victim Injun for growing up on the land my ancestors were forced onto?

I feel no lasting bitterness over what happened in 1832, so I guess I'm a guilty white.

And yes, it is contemptible, to echo J.C. Watts, that this legacy is still being hustled today. You think I would prefer growing up the ancestral lands in Mississippi? :) I'm not held down by that legacy at all.

Reply

seawasp October 29 2009, 14:30:32 UTC
Why not be BOTH? Then you can oppress yourself, hate yourself for being the oppressor, and fight against the oppression you're responsible for against your own people, and do all this without even having to leave the comfort of your own armchair??

Reply

jordan179 October 29 2009, 16:19:13 UTC
History is important as something to learn from. When recent, it should be a guide to whom to trust and whom not to trust (for the countervailing example, witness Obama's current Iranian follies). But once the point is reached where all the victors and victims are dead, and the social institutions have changed on both sides, it is silly to carry grudges. That's what the PC crowd doesn't get.

Reply

typewriterking October 29 2009, 17:24:11 UTC
But once the point is reached where all the victors and victims are dead, and the social institutions have changed on both sides, it is silly to carry grudges.

I keep remembering stories from Japanese and Arab culture, about Blood Feuds that lasted generation after generation until all those on one side were dead. Entire generations whose only reason for existence was to Avenge the Dishonor of My Clan/Tribe.

Reply


Race as destiny... zornhau October 29 2009, 09:37:18 UTC
Saying a particular ethnic category automatically bears a particular burden of guilt... isn't that racism?

LOL. Thanks for the link.

Reply

Re: Race as destiny... lather2002 October 29 2009, 12:37:17 UTC

... )

Reply

Re: Race as destiny... zornhau October 29 2009, 13:15:29 UTC
This could just be a couple having fun on holiday and it would be racist to assume otherwise without more context. However, I'm guessing you've posted this because he's a drooling sex tourist and she's an impoverished Carribean lady forced into prostitution. If so:

Yes it's exploitation, but how is her situation different from that of the ladies of the Former Eastern Block who fill the brothels of Europe?

In some places, for historical reasons, race is a mostly reliable marker for wealth. However, the exploitation is about wealth, not race.

Reply

Re: Race as destiny... gothelittle October 29 2009, 13:26:43 UTC
She's no prostitute. Look at her. Look at her jewelry. Mildly expensive, but tasteful. Look at her outfit. Before I noticed the jewelry, I thought they were an athlete and her trainer.

She's also not impoverished and certainly not starving. Look at her arm. Look at her teeth. Come to think of it, just look at her eyes.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up