0F. [text] oh user oh user oh user oh user

Jun 21, 2011 23:34

Recent discussion of Event:"Fuckening" warrants further inquiry.

Query: What taboos if any exist concerning overt discussion of User sexual activity?

Explanation required concerning status(virgin,not virgin). Query: Reason for significance attached to virginity?

[private to Narvin, TOTALLY UNRELATED]

Query: Veracity of information released by Inmate

oh user what, rinzler fails biology forever, rinzler might be afraid of the fuckening, text, this isn't the grid, ic, halp, rinzler is a virgin, rinzler is a helper

Leave a comment

Comments 134

neuroticalson June 22 2011, 06:37:11 UTC
I don't care about taboos.

If you're a virgin, that means you probably couldn't find someone willing to bang you. Meaning, you probably really suck.

So, that probably applies to you.

Reply

ifightfor June 22 2011, 06:43:18 UTC
[OF COURSE YOU WOULD BE THE FIRST PERSON TO REPLY TO THIS.

Creator fucking damn it why did he even open this can of non-Euclidean sex worms in the first place. Fucking Abyss gazing also into him.]

Conventional definition already on file.

Reply

neuroticalson June 22 2011, 06:47:15 UTC
[IT'S A SEX QUESTION, NEXT ONLY TO MURDER QUESTIONS ON HIS LIST OF FAVORITE THINGS TO DISCUSS OKAY.]

Well, I'm giving you the significance attached to virginity. If you're still a virgin, and you're over a certain age, you're probably a loser.

Reply

ifightfor June 22 2011, 06:53:36 UTC
[WELL AT LEAST THEY'D PROBABLY HAVE SOMETHING IN COMMON DISCUSSING MURDER.]

Query: What a [no don't ask that that way lies madness]

Understood.

Reply


timesbureaucrat June 22 2011, 06:47:52 UTC
[The Time Lord taboo about discussing sex is so strong that he's not even going to acknowledge that Rinzler asked that question.]

[Private]

I decided that since half the population is probably thinking that question, even if they're too polite--or cowardly--to ask me to my face, I'm addressing it publicly. [Or mostly publicly. As public as Ardent's post was.]

Reply

ifightfor June 22 2011, 06:51:29 UTC
[Probably a good idea; the only reason Rinzler is even asking this is because if he doesn't he will, like Kay, see the day when everything he protects burns because he didn't take THE FUCKENING seriously.]

[Private]

Understood.

Reply


majorum_pride June 22 2011, 07:33:48 UTC
I am afraid I can't elaborate on... the first subject. [SOMEONE HAS A WHOLE CULTURE BASED OFF SEX AND REPRODUCTION. Let's have this painfully awkward robot man discussion.Taboos related to sexual activity vary according to culture, frequently tying into religious and political unions and the production of children ( ... )

Reply

ifightfor June 22 2011, 08:16:05 UTC
[This is MUCH MORE RATIONAL than...uh...well whatever the discussion with Slick turned into up there.]

Query: Human sexual urge seen as requiring restraint? Why?

Reply

majorum_pride June 22 2011, 08:30:49 UTC
[Some people just bring out the crazy in you sometimes.]

Human sexual urge is restrained for a variety of reasons. Reasons include the impairment of rational judgement in daily interactions or high stress situations through distraction and difficulty in concentration.

For some, complete restraint implies that the mind has priority over the impulses given to it by the body relating to pain and pleasure, and can maintain satisfaction independently of the pleasurable sensations related to sex. Similarly, controlling ones impulses in general is seen as important, implying the dominance of the mind dictating the reactions of the body.

Sexual restraint provides a greater point of reference for genetic heritage, permitting family lines to be followed in order to trace ancestry without chance of interference by outside DNA. Sexual restraint is also essential in ensuring both parties are willing and fully engaged participants in any intimate acts.

Reply

ifightfor June 22 2011, 08:51:13 UTC
Understood.

[Several seconds go by.]

Thank you.

Reply


Private hopeless_hacker June 22 2011, 10:51:54 UTC
I think Rhade covered that better than I could.

[also she has 100+1 sexual hangups, hence very relieved she doesn't have to talk about it.]

I...don't think circumstances will ever arise on the Barge which will allow the - [snrrk no she can't do it without smiling] - Fuckening to go through as he had planned.

Reply

Private ifightfor June 22 2011, 12:08:18 UTC
Circumstances unlikely. However all threats to security require equally serious approach until such a time as proven null.

[Pause. Pause.]

Also provided convenient excuse for questions. Inmate Gaheris Rhade was helpful. [even if the entire topic is kind of horrifying to him.]

Reply

Private hopeless_hacker June 22 2011, 12:47:32 UTC
Maybe. I don't suppose I want to be the one getting eaten by a dragon because I didn't take 'the Fuckening' as a potentially serious threat.

Is there anything else you need to know? It didn't occur to me that wouldn't know - well - anything about this sphere of human life.

Reply

Private. ifightfor June 22 2011, 13:11:02 UTC
[There's a long delay as he considers this.]

Basic mechanical understanding present. Previous memories from breach flood also present. Cultural assumptions about taboos, manners, propriety, User reasoning behind them--not present.

Extent and nature of User sexuality|

[pause. pause.]

disturbing.

Viruses breed. Programs do not.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

indeed. :c ifightfor June 22 2011, 12:04:13 UTC

Leave a comment

Up