So, part of the current race/culture/privilege controversy exploding all over the SF&F community online involves a very prominent and well-respected author in the field being
a complete idiot about the existence of fans of color (apparently, we're newly-sprung from the head of Octavia Butler, all Minervas of Color). In response, a call was put
(
Read more... )
Comments 17
I just read the link and now I'm having trouble squaring the accusations with the reality of what was said. Here's what I get on first reading:
1) Fans of color are at an all-time record high number
2) This is a hopeful sign
3) A couple generations ago, fans of color were super-rare
#1 seems obviously true both in absolute and proportional terms, and #2 seems a positive opinion, both of which were ignored in everything I've seen. #3 is the heart of the controversy.
In most posts, #3 has mutated from "there weren't many fans of color" to "there aren't any fans of color," which is an unfair restatement. This whole census idea seems better suited to the mutated version of #3 than what she actually said and implied ( ... )
Reply
2) This is a hopeful sign
3) A couple generations ago, fans of color were super-rare
#1 seems obviously true both in absolute and proportional terms
True where? And how do you define "fans"?
Reply
Why do you ask?
Reply
I don't think the internet has caused an enormous jump in fans of color. I think they've been around all along, in the U.S. and elsewhere, but not as visible to non-chromatic con-going types.
Reply
Reply
Reply
And also happy, happy yellow :)
Reply
I'm going to ask my dad what he thinks about this - he was a big Asimov fan back in the day, and thought it was a good idea to take his not-even-1-year-old daughter to see Star Wars in the theater.
Reply
Reply
(Yes, I realize that you were months-old and so didn't really "see" anything. Doesn't change the cool factor a bit, though.)
Reply
--elisamaza76i
Reply
I miss those days; this ignorance is depressing.
Reply
Leave a comment