Model!Monty

Dec 11, 2010 08:17


Read more... )

news, -montolivo, video

Leave a comment

Comments 10

(The comment has been removed)

cheryl_bites December 11 2010, 14:42:02 UTC
WHAT HAVE THEY DONE TO HIM, KELLIE?! This is a crime against pulchritude!

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

cheryl_bites December 11 2010, 14:54:17 UTC
*Peers closer* I'm not sure that's even real eyeliner. It's so close to the white of the eye it looks computer-generated. Why would they do that? I know that sometimes his eyes pop and he looks like an alien, but adding thick black eyeliner has not solved that problem. In fact, it's made it worse.

Edit: LOOK!


... )

Reply


dirtbunnies December 11 2010, 14:38:08 UTC
That's a LOT of guyliner, Monty. And with your hair pulled back so we can't see it, you look like a girl in drag.

I don't understand fashion at all. I don't think I ever will.

Reply

cheryl_bites December 11 2010, 14:41:46 UTC
No fashion was involved in the making of this calendar.

Reply


cheryl_bites December 11 2010, 14:41:09 UTC
1. AAAAAAAAAAAAAA *Catches breath* AAAAAAAAARGH!! He was not even within five miles of that photo shoot! Listen, photogs, that amount of eye make-up would be appropriate for Charlie Chaplin but NOT Humphrey Bogart, and you do NOT have to lighten the whites of the eyes that much when the model is standing IN SHADOW! (I didn't realise this post was at Forzaviola, as usual, and I swear he looked so horrible I thought he was Marchisio ( ... )

Reply

bustedflush December 11 2010, 16:02:34 UTC
3. lol I was trying to exert self-control and not rant about how some of them (INCLUDING THIS ONE) have nothing to do with the movies they claim to represent, and you're doing the same on the photography/manip work. We are very nice people, the pair of us. :D (The one that really alarms me is the Sabrina one. Is there a subtheme of drag here? Cos that chick and Monty's stylists/photoshoppers seem to have thought so.)
4. God, it must be so irritating to him sometimes, to have to be all gracious about utterly atrocious of fundraising dross.

Reply

cheryl_bites December 11 2010, 16:24:25 UTC
3. Hee! Careful, now, Martha, or we'll ruin your reputation. (That's one of the ones where the head appears to have been manipped onto someone else's body. I think they may have used Audrey Hepburn's hair, too. I'm not sure which parts of the picture show the actual model, assuming any of them do.)

Reply


angualupin December 11 2010, 16:24:19 UTC
*gasps in horror* Colour me terrified. Are his eyeballs trying to eat me?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up