You think open bornders are ok? THINK AGAIN.
I mean is anyone really surprised? I mean with MILLIONS of people being able to freely cross our border, is it any wonder that our enemies would choose to do this. This report alone is justification for any military action against Iran. Because if a guy is willing to blow himself apart to kill a few infidels, imagine that idiot with a small nuke.
( Read more... )
Reply
So what if religious organizations fund terrorism. Without a strong state, political power typically falls to the church.
That doesn't make it a religious war. It's still a political one.
Reply
Seriously. This repetition bullshit is pointless.
Let me know what country ObL runs and get back to me. This is a waste of my time.
Kudos. For a split second back there you approached a useful point.
Reply
Reply
"SCREEEEEECH! IT'S POLITICS AND POLITICS ONLY AND DON'T YOU DEFY ME! I WILL REPEAT UNTIL YOU GO AWAY!"
Oh my head.
Refusing to recognize the religious element requires an astounding level of deliberate denial, up to and including ignoring the actual words of the guy living in a cave who orchestrated the attack on our soil.
Which of course can only lead to their next extremist step, immediately jumping to the condemnation and equation of all religions.
Nuance!
Reply
In the Great Depression, we had a strong government. It might have expanded the Great Depression, but it quelled the people into believing that it *was* addressing the problem. While people lost faith in capitalism, they did not lose faith in the government.
Considering that most suicide bombers are far more educated than the average person, I'd be kinda dumb to think that it was poverty that created the problem. But With increasing knowledge of al-Qaeda, we see that “the presence of American military forces for combat operations on the homeland territory of the suicide terrorists is stronger than Islamic fundamentalism in predicting whether individuals from that country will become al-Qaeda suicide terrorists” (103). “Al-Qaeda is less a transnational network of like-minded ideologues . . . than a cross-national military alliance of national liberation movements working together against what they see as a common imperial threat” (104). The nature of ( ... )
Reply
Yes. You would be. Sadly that doesn't stop similar arguments with as little merit. A big old link to something unrelated to your assertion doesn't really help us much.
Politics, you say? Hm.
Maybe the teacher was covertly promoting a return to Western colonialism but the government would rather we think they're beating her for naming a teddy bear!
A name, I might add, provided by the kids, who are so unimaginative and screwed up that they'd come up with the list of names they did because of the ignorance loving pervasive religion, in a country that will likely remain a third world country due to that religion.
While you dutifully whine about how this is all the fault of Western colonialism, as you did while your professors patted you on the head and you salivated whenever bells rang, you are being as "dumb" as those who would say poverty created the problem.
Reply
Go on. Let's see you post count a little more.
Reply
You've got nothing, huh, honey? And now you can't even be original. You have to steal my lines and hope the boys come rescue the poor little girl.
Fantastic. You are woman! Hear you whimper and scurry away. AHAHAHAHAA!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Seriously. You destroy any hope at intelligent arguments. You're the biggest troll in this community, yet you're accepted because you spout off the right ideology.
I've never seen you respond to a comment without an ad hominem attack. You're a train wreck. Have fun mocking everyone else. But you're not getting any more entertainment out of me.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment