Leave a comment

Comments 16

(The comment has been removed)

chiri_chan November 17 2007, 22:30:34 UTC
Thanks. :)

Yeah, the butterflies make me happy (when they load that is.)

Reply


savingpeople November 16 2007, 23:57:22 UTC
"Obscura"'s teaser! Of course ( ... )

Reply

chiri_chan November 17 2007, 22:32:43 UTC

I think you're right about the Pre-Wrath and Post-Wrath timeframe. It'll be interesting to compare them in the end.

I think it's going to be pretty apparent in the long run.

I knew there had to be a triangle shot of Chloe coming through the screendoor, but I was lazy in making caps. Thanks for doing what I didn't :)

Welcome. It shows that Chloe comes between them. Literally. Continues to, even now.

BWAH! Nicely done. :)

Welll?

Didn't they do that same kind of thing with the DP newspaper date in Jimmy's dream in "Noir"?

Nope.

They put Noir ahead to make the later timelines fit. Noir was in May despite it airing in April.

Good call about the black and white clothes!

It's the direct inverse isn't it?

Reply

savingpeople November 17 2007, 22:50:05 UTC
This is what I was talking about from "Noir":
http://www.svfan.com/screenshots/S6/6.20_Noir/slides/6.20_Noir_1920x1080_117.jpg

Wasn't May 3rd the airdate of that episode?

I remember Lana wearing some white in "Sneeze" and I hated that and now, that I think about it she WAS wearing the white over some black :)

Reply

chiri_chan November 17 2007, 23:08:58 UTC
Maybe you are right. Why did I think Noir was later?

Reply


itsgood2bme November 17 2007, 04:06:27 UTC
For starters, your screencaps rock, Chiri ( ... )

Reply

chiri_chan November 17 2007, 22:37:23 UTC
Clark definitely feels violated, and isn't liking it.

It's not dissimilar to Chloe's cover up in Blank either.

Thanks!

Reply


vivamexico November 17 2007, 10:33:28 UTC
I didn't even notice the Obscura similarities in the beginning, I was too busy thinking it looked like a cross between an allergy medicine commercial and a douche commercial. Good catch ( ... )

Reply

vivamexico November 17 2007, 10:47:27 UTC
Okay, your caps reminded me of two more things: One, how *sad* Lana looked when she thought Lex cut off her spy feed. She wants Lex to want her to watch him.

Also, how Lana's face went from sad to...almost evil when Chloe walked away from her at the end of their Isis confrontation. I really hope this Chlana thing goes somewhere. In Blue, I noticed that Chloe completely brushed off Clark's remark about Lana's physical status to focus on how Clark was doing. Yay!

Reply

chiri_chan November 17 2007, 22:35:47 UTC
Lana's pretty creeeeeepy.

Reply

chiri_chan November 17 2007, 22:34:40 UTC
Good catch. Thanks!

And I got such a kick out of hearing Chloe mention Ra in her Isis breakdown.

Clark is Ra. It's so pointed. It also makes sense out of Isobel.

as well as a sign that Lana is a seductress. In the beginning, Clark says there's been a lot of distance between them, hence the champagne and truffles. clearly sex was not on Clark's mind when Lana became Super

Oh totally. And the temptress is not the role of the heroine.

-I didn't mind Clark wanting another way to change Lana back. Even if it's Lana, I understand him not wanting to electrocute his girlfriend. Plus, I think it's a good comparison to Lana, who *wanted* to electrocute Lex.

GREAT Call Marta.

She loves that he lied to protect her, but she hates that he won't abuse his powers for her.

So. twisted.

Reply


pep_singer November 17 2007, 19:28:11 UTC
Good review!

I love the triangle blocking of Clark, Chloe, and Lana with Clark clearly in the middle. It gives me hope because it shows 1) Chloe hasn't given up on Clark romantically yet and 2) If you think about the way they are standing (from left to right) it's Lana, Clark, and Chloe, which would equal the idea that it's Lana who's chasing Clark who's chasing Chloe, if that makes sense (Lana-->Clark-->Chloe).

Reply

chiri_chan November 17 2007, 22:36:17 UTC
(1) No she hasn't at all, and (2) GREAT point!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up