Yesterday I got into an unpleasant
discussion with another LJ user on the topic of Child Protection Agencies and the removal of children from their homes wither upon the determination of, or while the situation is being investigated whether the child is safer being removed from the parents or the current place of residence
(
Read more... )
Reply
i think i love them very much and i'm positive that nobody will love them more or care for them better (well, maybe somebody may care for them better than I do), but I'm pretty sure there are many things in my house (starting from circumcision) that might be considered "abuse". actually, I was left alone in the appt, since I was 3 years old, there was plenty of screaming and spanking in my parent's house, still I'm terryfied that I could have been taken away by well-meaning authority. ALso, there is a lot of research on attachment, separation and its long-term effect. you might wanto to consider it.
(not to say that some kids shouldn't be removed. they should be, but it's an extreme measure, for extreme cases, and the system shouldn't assume that parents are guilty before charged).
Reply
Reply
besides, a child is taken to a foster home, which is a temporary place, where it's not possible to form stable attachment to anybody. In many cases, when the abusive figure is the father (or mothers' boyfriend), the mother is hte only only emotional source of security for such a child, and removal from her might be experienced on many levels across entire life-span just like the early abuse is experienced on many levels across entire life-span.
Reply
did I give you the impression that I think otherwise?
Reply
As to somebody stabbing my kid in the throat, me actually being a parent makes me much more objecting in evaluating the risks and benefits. And my evaluation is -- the risks (at least in the current state of affairs) out-weight the benefits. When you become a parent, you too I am sure will have the opportunity to do an objective evaluation. And then we'll have an informed debate.
Reply
no Areg, I will never have anything close to an "informed debate" if I allow even an ounce of the emotions I will feel for my own children enter into it.
That's EXACTLY the problem.
Reply
The most core values in our society revolve around our feelings for our children. That said, none spoke of emotions. I am talking about the tragedy inflicted upon a family during a "mistaken" child removal by a power hungry CPA. For now you dismiss this as some triviality.
Reply
Reply
********
Sorry, that's just your imagination. What people say is that they are unwilling to risk the safety of their children just for the hypothetical benefit of another child. Then you take this, and exaggerate it ad absurdum.
I know that I will not do anything to harm my child, so being scared of DSS is in the same realm for me as being scared of being beaten to death by a cop.
********
There are some MAJOR differences. I personally would never compare the consequences of being beaten by a cop to the consequences of my child being mistakenly taken away from me. Furthermore, there are remedies and recourses against police brutality. REAL recourses. Almost precise opposite is true for DSS -- you have a lot less rights when it comes to them.
Reply
Leave a comment