i knew there was a reason that i don't use this forum much for personal journaling...
and now i have "evidence" ;~}
thanks to
SMliles Lewis for posting this entry on his blogoriginally from
an article by Andy Coghlan @ NewScientist.com:
according to studies by UK psychologists, "regular diarists were more likely than non-diarists to suffer from
(
Read more... )
Comments 11
But she acknowledges that her experiment could not demonstrate which came first - the diary writing or the health problems.
Hell-o!
Reply
dem bumbaclaat shrinks attit agin!
Reply
Reply
I&I have an inherent distrust of psychology's basis in "artsy-craftsy philosophical soft science," but it's certainly worth a laugh sometimes.
ruminating about this "soft-science" issue produced some amusing links:
Art Craft Soft Science Hard Science Taxonomy
Beyond the Physical - Science and Occultism: 3.1 The "Hard" And The "Soft" Sciences
Beyond the Physical - Science and Occultism: 9.0 Just What Do We Mean By A Science Of Psychology?
and here's an all-time favorite "artsy-craftsy philosophical soft science model:"
RAW's rendition of Leary's 8-circuit model of human consciousnessin the section concerning the Neuro-Atomic Circuit (VIII), there is this reference ( ... )
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
this study reminded me of the idea of geek social fallacies
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
then can we reasonably prove that milk causes heroin addiction?
it's showdown of the century:
The US Drug War turns its sights on the The American Dairy Association!!!
and the retalliation...
Cows with Guns
so, now we must stop the mad cows (seriously, though).
Reply
Leave a comment