The MSM is at it again, wringing their hands and professing bewilderment over a House vote to repeal Obamacare. Why, the ask, do something that "will never pass"? And isn't that a "waste of time ( Read more... )

While I'm happy to see Obama following in the footsteps of Reagan again (first with tax cuts and now with arms reductions) the concerns of the Republicans who voted against this treaty should not be discounted ( Read more... )

At least not in its present form ( Read more... )

Republicans have now captured two more seats in the House as additional election returns become final. Republicans in Texas and New York were declared the winner recently, bringing the total number of House seats that changed hands to +63 for the party.

What would you like to see the Republicans in the House do?

• Play defense: stop additional ( Read more... )

Bill Clinton tried to get the Democrat candidate for Senate (Kendrick Meek) in Florida to drop out and endorse "independent" candidate Charlie Crist ( Read more... )

After reading this story about Kagan and Sharia law, I have some questions for her. It may be too late for the Senate Judiciary committee but not too late to obtain before a general vote ( Read more... )

Finally ( Read more... )

She's not even as controversial as Sotomayor was.

As with Sotomayor she's not someone I would nominate and I'm sure there will be many decisions in which I'm on the opposite side of the ruling but Obama won the election and barring an unforeseen scandal there's nothing in her past which should deny her confirmation.

( Read more... )

It's a good thing he's retiring. He knows he would have gotten stomped in the primaries for things like this.
With help from a single Republican, George Voinovich of Ohio, Democrats by a 60-40 vote beat back a challenge from Republicans seeking to force them to pay for the measure with new revenues or cuts in spending rather than adding costs to ( Read more... )

At this point I don't think anyone is surprised by the continued hypocrisy of the Democrats. When they were in the minority in 2005 they called the "nuclear" option "arrogant" and "not what the Founders intended".
Apparently the nuclear option is now neither arrogant nor against the principles of the Founding Fathers. Gee, I wonder what's changed ( Read more... )