Things I don't grok (on cross-gender friendships)

Mar 20, 2010 21:04

Girl Talk: Should I Be Jealous Of His Female Friends? -- it was the comments I found especially noteworthy, really. Although plenty of commenters express that they're ok with their partners having friends of a different gender, a large number seem to consider it so normal not to accept this that it's almost taken-for-granted (especially the ( Read more... )

poly, gender, contemplating

Leave a comment

qualistarian March 21 2010, 13:36:17 UTC
It's the "When Harry Met Sally" conversation, quoted here for your convenience:

Harry Burns: You realize of course that we could never be friends.
Sally Albright: Why not?
Harry Burns: What I'm saying is - and this is not a come-on in any way, shape or form - is that men and women can't be friends because the sex part always gets in the way.
Sally Albright: That's not true. I have a number of men friends and there is no sex involved.
Harry Burns: No you don't.
Sally Albright: Yes I do.
Harry Burns: No you don't.
Sally Albright: Yes I do.
Harry Burns: You only think you do.
Sally Albright: You say I'm having sex with these men without my knowledge?
Harry Burns: No, what I'm saying is they all WANT to have sex with you.
Sally Albright: They do not.
Harry Burns: Do too.
Sally Albright: They do not.
Harry Burns: Do too.
Sally Albright: How do you know?
Harry Burns: Because no man can be friends with a woman that he finds attractive. He always wants to have sex with her.
Sally Albright: So, you're saying that a man can be friends with a woman he finds unattractive?
Harry Burns: No. You pretty much want to nail 'em too.
Sally Albright: What if THEY don't want to have sex with YOU?
Harry Burns: Doesn't matter because the sex thing is already out there so the friendship is ultimately doomed and that is the end of the story.
Sally Albright: Well, I guess we're not going to be friends then.
Harry Burns: I guess not.
Sally Albright: That's too bad. You were the only person I knew in New York.

Now, in a lot of ways, I do agree with this characterization, because given opportunity and the absence of an ethical repercussion, I would sleep with most of my female friends. This breaks down as follows:
1) single, not interested in me. A little awkward for awhile, but I've gotten used to that.
2) closed relationship. See "ethical repercussions," above. I don't "steal" women (which is a ridiculous term, but there it is).
3) single (or open relationship), interested in me. No problem.

This is where I disagree with the movie - I don't consider sex to be anathema to friendship.
Friendship with someone you have a sexual interest in may be different from friendship with someone you don't, but I certainly don't see it as impossible. As to friendship with someone you're sleeping with...well, if you weren't friends in the first place, why would you be sleeping with them?

Reply

moominmuppet March 21 2010, 19:44:11 UTC
*chuckle* That scene is the one I hate most in the movie; it's upset me since I first saw it, for exactly all these reasons.

This is where I disagree with the movie - I don't consider sex to be anathema to friendship.
Friendship with someone you have a sexual interest in may be different from friendship with someone you don't, but I certainly don't see it as impossible. As to friendship with someone you're sleeping with...well, if you weren't friends in the first place, why would you be sleeping with them?

*nod* That part makes perfect sense to me.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up