Did Ground Zero mosque founder lie to New Yorkers? Is his real goal Sharia Law?

[zerorevenge]

Former terrorist Walid Shoebat, reveals disturbing contradictions between Ground Zero mosque founder Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf’s English statements and his Arabic comments. Abdul Rauf directly contradicted his New York Daily News article from earlier this week, and, in the process, lied to New York City about his true intentions. Watch video here

Comments

[dark_haru]

Let them build it, then the citizens of NY will destroy it in a day. Sharia law will never find a foothold in America like it has in Europe.

[mosinging1986]

That's the bad thing, though. If that place is built and suffers so much as a scratch, they will have grounds to claim yet MORE victimhood and NYC will bow down even further to them.

The only good I can see coming from this is if people infiltrate it to see what is being taught there. Although with the way things are going, they could be giving a detailed plan of their next attack and the authorities would do... nothing.

[cutelildrow]

even video camera evidence won't convince the bleeding hearts. I'm actually convinced that killing more Americans isn't enough to convince them. It's already happened, look at all the excuses they make for the terrorists instead.

[mosinging1986]

Yep. For people like that, the self-delusion is so strong that they could literally have a knife at their throat held by a Muslim reading the Koran out loud to them, and they'd *still* deny Islam has anything to do with it. They would still be making excuses for the person and claiming Islam is a religion of peace, even as they breathed their last.

I am convinced of this.

[mosinging1986]

I must find this book. It will probably have me screaming in fury, but I must read it. Hate to give him any money, but I feel this is important.

Too bad the clowns pushing for this mosque won't bother reading it, even if someone handed it to them and begged them to do so.

[konami]

There's no victory or defeat unless seen through selective symbolism or superstition. What this amounts to is another Mosque in New York.

[mosinging1986]

They could have a mosque anywhere in NY where the law allows for it. They chose to put it *there*, deliberately, as a symbol of conquest and to spit in our faces as a country.

[konami]

I understand the possible meanings here. However what I have a problem with is that there should be some basis for rejection here; Should a building be denied on a symbolic and superstitious basis? That type of barbaric law-making is more suited to Islamic law.

[mosinging1986]

That is the crux of the matter, yes. And the great difficulty. I don't know that there's a legal way around it either.

Maybe if there was some way to designate Islam as not a religion but a political ideology? Or to come at the issue along the lines of national security? I don't know if that would be helpful. I wish I was knowledgeable about the law in this regard, but I'm not.