(Untitled)

[yucca]

Я должна извиниться. В предыдущем посте я фактически обвинила whocares1970 в лицемерии. Но, пролистав его журнал назад на несколько месяцев (на большее меня не хватило), я соглашусь, что свобода слова - не его конек. Его конек - это утверждение, что "левый - значит мерзавец", что левые "generally harm this country as much as possible", что "идёт совершеннейшая

Comments

[whocares1970]

Вы написали, вот прямо сегодня:

>> Я обязуюсь больше вас в своей журнале не цитировать - извините, это была минутная слабость. <<

И вот опять цитируете. Видимо, ваша слабость не очень минутная. :)

Ну хорошо. Тогда вот что. Вы пишете:

>> То есть он вполне за подавление оппонентов, причем всякими нестандартными способами, просто потому что оппоненты мерзавцы <<

Будьте добры, прибавьте конкретики.
(1) Каковы именно эти нестандартные способы?
(2) Действительно ли просто потому, что мерзавцы, или там упомянуты конкретные действия?

Re: Re: я читала оригиналы статей

[tandem_bike]

ABSOLUTELY NOT THE SAME.

she is profane, hate-mongering and completely out of control, a shame to her school. in her official twitter account.
he is on an anonymous russian-language platform, never profane, making statements that i consider misguided, but they are not the same. incomparable.

Re: Re: я читала оригиналы статей

[yucca]

And you, of all people, are angry about her being profane? Ah yes, anonymity.

Re: Re: я читала оригиналы статей

[tandem_bike]

yes, me, of all people. i don't attack half the country, only some assholes online, whom i dislike personally or who are trying to trash me.

you really see no difference, do you? same with George. eiter you are extremely hypocritical, or this is some mental defect of yours.

Re: Re: я читала оригиналы статей

[yucca]

Well, I don't know if this is a defect but I do react stronger when somebody attacks me or my friend than when somebody attacks half the country even if it's the half I belong to.

Re: Re: я читала оригиналы статей

[tandem_bike]

you may react any which way, but you cannot compare incomparables: leaving me alone, comparing who this little idiot girl says and what George says is dishonest: she is inciting hatred and violence against police, he is waxing poetic that the left need to be "suppressed" or the country will burst into a war.

i don't agree with him, and "suppression" is vague enough. if he offered to "suppress" by kidnapping the governors of blue states, i would say George, i am reporting you to FBI, idiot you. but he would never say or plan such crazy stuff as "a good leftie is a dead leftie": this is also incitement.

he is not racist. he recognizes, as i do, that

1. BLM, a previously harmless and inconsequential marxist outfit, has partnered with antifa and became a danger to this country.

2. racial dialogue in this country has gone completely out of whack and resulted in absurdities such as white privilege shaming, taking to the knee, and cancel culture.

RE: Re: Re: я читала оригиналы статей

[whocares1970]

I have sent you a private message.

Re: Re: Re: я читала оригиналы статей

[tandem_bike]

i read it. i think you misunderstood me, i NEVER even remotely thought you were into civil war or any violence or even militia activities ( you know how i am about those ;-0 )

so i think Yu and you are talking over each other's heads, neither is listening.

however.......

if you disapprove of that little idiot in MA and approve of Damore, then Yucca is right, it is a double standard for not free speech ( both are exercising it) but socially allowed speech.

true, damore never called for violence.
the question is, do i want him in MY company? no. no more than i want that little bitch in MY college.

[messala]

"Вы полагаете, что общественность не имела права (морального) её резко осудить? Вы скажите, не стесняйтесь"

Речь идет не о каком-то абстрактном "общественном осуждении", а о конкретных доносах и административных санкциях.

Вы действительно от тех пресловутых левых отличаетесь только цветом шарфика.