"me-me-me-me-me-me-me"(scaling a tonal range), AAARRRGGGHHH!!! Ahem. Yes. Well now. Now that, that has been said, let's get on with it shall we
( ... )
Might not expressing either comprehension or confusion (or Confsciuosness) of wei-wu-wei tempt the illusory ego to make distinctions and therefore dualities that are separate from non-dual being?
Thus the Paradox.
Could be it be that learning or growing in one's understanding of non-dualism would be a form of striving and is not striving an intentional act and therefore dualistic?
More Paradox. I think one "solution" is to be headed in the Direction, but when "in the moment" to not be striving at all.
The words of of the text required thought, logic, judgement and reason
...if you say so...
all of which are illusory constructs of an illusory ego which is required so that the texts describing wei-wu=wei can be deciphered so that illusory and egoistic experinces can be attempted in the egoistic hope that meditation can lead to actions that are non-dualistic, but careful now, lest you try to understand those non-dualistic actions and in so doing become dualistic all over again before you were to move beyond egoistic constructs
( ... )
Comments 4
Reply
Thus the Paradox.
Could be it be that learning or growing in one's understanding of non-dualism would be a form of striving and is not striving an intentional act and therefore dualistic?
More Paradox. I think one "solution" is to be headed in the Direction, but when "in the moment" to not be striving at all.
The words of of the text required thought, logic, judgement and reason
...if you say so...
all of which are illusory constructs of an illusory ego which is required so that the texts describing wei-wu=wei can be deciphered so that illusory and egoistic experinces can be attempted in the egoistic hope that meditation can lead to actions that are non-dualistic, but careful now, lest you try to understand those non-dualistic actions and in so doing become dualistic all over again before you were to move beyond egoistic constructs ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment