Today is sucky and full of stupid tears and I'm feeling emo. So I'm going to lock myself in my room and read my new copy of Good Omens, which I've been meaning to read for a while and finally picked up today. While I was at the bookstore, I also started reading Joan Didion's The Year of Magical Thinking, and, man, I love her prose
(
Read more... )
Comments 21
The only impression I got of Oliver Cromwell is that he was pretty much a bastard, too. But then, this was in an American classroom; we are not known for having the best perspective on things that have nothing to do with us. (Or, indeed, things that do have something to do with us.)
Reply
Were I not feeling so emo I would think that was fascinating, and want to understand where the different perspectives come from, or at least go read his wikipedia page. However, I am meh, so I... still think it's pretty interesting, but feel to lazy to wikipedia it. AND, MAN, WHEN YOU'RE TOO LAZY TO USE WIKIPEDIA, YOU KNOW SOMETHING IS NOT RIGHT.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Re: Cromwell, well, if you were Irish you had plenty of good reasons to hate him. (as in, a LOT OF DEAD BODIES.) Or if you were in any way connected to the theatre, seeing as he made it illegal. Or if you were a Catholic. But he definitely was a far more talented ruler than Charles I. ever was (Charles I: like his grandmother Mary, personal niceness does not make up for ruler incompetence. The only Stuart I could ever stand was Charles II., who reminds me of no one as much as his maternal grandfather, Henri Quatre - both without any religious fanaticism in a fanatic age, both used to lack of power, defeat and exile before they got the top job, and both witty and to the point in their conversation). And tried his best to make this non-monarchy work, especially economically.
Reply
Except for Cromwell, and what I know about him is that he was a smart ruler, and a very important figure in regards to England's development. I remember being amused (in that "oh, important people of history everywhere, you do such stupid things, I can only lol and hope nobody does that again." ...it's a thing, right?) that he offed Charles I., reopened the Parliament, and then took the country for himself and dismissed it again. I think Henry VII and Elizabeth came off looking good, and the other Tudors were stupid. Which is overly simplistic, of course, but it worked to remember who was who.
In any case, very interesting. They dug up his corpse and beheaded it? Did not know that. Ouch.
Reply
Reply
Mary is an interesting case, as you point out. And I was also just thinking of Evelyn, Mary and Elizabeth.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
*blinks* Are those on the picspams you made? I DO NOT REMEMBER THAT. I'm going after them right now.
Reply
Reply
Your icon is so freaking adorable, btw.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Also Lost, totally. MY SHOWS. COME BACK.
Know how like, in the movies, a character who never does anything wrong does something ONCE, and then everyone around is all, "oh, person x, so wonderful, never does anything wrong!", and then Person X feels very bad? Far from me to say I don't do bad things in a alarming frequency, but WHAT UP, UNIVERSE.
and, oh, sigh, hp. I freaking love that universe. and so my heart is an easy target for it, yes.
Reply
Leave a comment