О космических обломках

Nov 17, 2021 10:54

Общественность опять возбудилась по поводу опасности космических обломков. Давайте попробуем оценить характерные цифры. (поправки приветствуются)

Read more... )

игра ума

Leave a comment

Comments 15

vashu11 November 17 2021, 05:04:08 UTC
Nelson said the astronauts now faced a four times greater risk than normal with the ISS passing near or through the debris cloud every 90 minutes.

His assessment was based on the risk from debris big enough to track. But hundreds of thousands of smaller pieces were going undetected - “any one of which can do enormous damage if it hits in the right place”.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/nov/15/us-investigating-debris-event-space-reports-russia-anti-satellite-weapon-test

Характерная формулировка без конкретной цифры - "в четыре раза больше чем нормально". Если бы речь шла хотя бы о одной сотой он бы не приминул ее назвать и сравнить скажем с комидом.

Limiting future collision risk to spacecraft an assessment of NASAs meteoroid and orbital debris programs by National Research Council (U.S.). - порядка одной миллионной частицы 1-10 см на м2


... )

Reply


vashu11 November 17 2021, 07:18:09 UTC
https://www.nap.edu/read/4765/chapter/6#64

https://www.nap.edu/read/5532/chapter/6#30
FIGURE 4-2 Effectiveness of Whipple bumper derivatives at various impactor velocities. Source: NASA.

Reply


vashu11 November 17 2021, 08:48:24 UTC
почему осколки такие плоские

MASS DISTRIBUTION OF ORBITING MAN-MADE SPACE DEBRIS T. Dale Bess

most fragments were irregularly shaped, flat plates. About 15 percent had a length-width ratio of approximately 5. The other 85 percent had a length-width ratio of about 2. In both cases the thickness was about one-fourth the width.

Reply


tengu_crow November 17 2021, 20:01:05 UTC
Отличная оценка, спасибо :)

Reply


max_andriyahov January 20 2022, 22:33:36 UTC
Хых) в одном тексте и ничтожная вероятность столкновения и характерный ущерб))) не тесновато?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up