I've almost finished reading La Peste for the second time, and like the first time, I feel really inspired. I feel I understand what Camus was saying, and the difference between him and Sartre, much better now - largely thanks to a random book attacking atheism which I found and flicked through in a bookshop. Sartre holds the view that man can, in
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
Certainly I am never sorry when a murderer kills themself in gaol.
Reply
I can always hope the cashiers and people behind me in line might be encouraged to do the same, however unlikely that is in small town America.
Reply
More seriously, ahem, I was quite taken with existentialism - I liked the idea of being answerable to yourself with regards to ethics and responsibility. As a result I studied Sartre for a term at uni. It wasn't the laugh I imagined it was, in fact "Being and Nothingness" nearly did my head in. Not quite as bad as Hegel, but still..
Out of interest, what's your issue with the death penalty? For my part, it's one of the few things I feel really sure about, I mean the wrongness of it. So much so that I don't think I could live in a country that practiced it.
Reply
The death penalty is such a big issue it probably deserves it's own LJ post. Basically, I think it makes more sense to kill people if you're 100% of their guilt in a very serious crime because the alternative, to lock them up for life, also just takes their life away, but over a longer period. Certain people you just can't rehabilitate. On the other hand, I also think it's a bad idea to allow the state, in any circumstance, to take a life, because it sets a precedent. So it's all very confusing.
Reply
Leave a comment