EGREGORE UPDATED

Sep 23, 2021 01:59

THE LINEAR EGREGORE VS THE REAL EMPOWERMENTS

(When I wrote this - some fifteen years ago - I was still trying to fight the good fight with OTO, Inc.  granted, it was a useless effort, as haters gonna hate, cultists gonna cling to cult.  I also realized that ecclesiastic lineages contribute to hierarchical theocratic dogmatic sectarianism, I have ( Read more... )

freemasonry, egregore, free_illuminism, paragnosticism

Leave a comment

Comments 37

whispernox September 27 2006, 06:57:28 UTC
Jeans creamed.

Looking for a clean pair...

Reply

creme de la creme tausirhasirim September 27 2006, 20:03:40 UTC
Jeans creamed.

Looking for a clean pair...

I'm glad you share my enthusiasm for...uhm....film noir.

Reply


weishaupt September 27 2006, 09:34:18 UTC
Drawing on my experience as a former elected member of the British Scociety for Psychical Research (SPR), I proposed an objective experiment, based on parapsychological “triple blind” carefully controlled experiments with alleged psychic healers. Bertiaux had said that he could tell by the ‘aura’ of Bishops which lineages they held, and which they did not, and I proposed a well-controlled, relatively inexpensive experiment in which unconsecrated ‘controls’ would be ‘read’ by a well-attested alleged ‘reader’ who would have the task of distinguishing the ‘unconsecrated’ from the ‘consecrated’. I outlined several variations. In short, I was willing to put my ideas to the test. David seemed less than enthused and nothing ever came of it.

Pity. I'm intrigued by the possibilities of this sort of experimentation.

Reply

Scientific Illuminism tausirhasirim September 27 2006, 20:09:54 UTC
I'm intrigued by the possibilities of this sort of experimentation.

I am more than intrigued....I think it is the essence of Scientific Illuminism. Silence & Strength recently pointed out that if you google "scientific illuminism" my name comes up first. Flatters my ego, but I wish it were otherwise. While one can argue the merits or lack thereof of various contributions to philosophy, poetry, mountain climbing, literature et al to emerge from the "A.C. school of occultism"- for me, Scientific Illuminism is the principle *original* contribution - the aim of religion, the method of science.

It has become alas a passing thought for many, drunk on superstition and belief-based notions, or equally drunk on 'reason' which - in and of itself - hardly comprehends the full range of the Great Questions.

But *I keep trying*. Is the OTO a suitable vehicle for this? Not under Brother Scriven, I'm afraid.

Reply

Re: Scientific Illuminism peristera September 28 2006, 00:33:08 UTC
If you google "dung of diseased prostitutes" our site comes up first

Reply

Re: Scientific Illuminism k_navit September 28 2006, 01:15:58 UTC
Bwahaha!

Reply


soror_daath September 27 2006, 14:57:45 UTC
“Let’s face it,” Bill proffered, after an embaradded silence, “ the future of Thelema belongs to academics. We’re the past.”

This bothers me GREATLY. : (

Reply

P.S. soror_daath September 27 2006, 14:59:01 UTC
NO. We're NOT the past.

Reply

Re: P.S. tausirhasirim September 27 2006, 20:17:37 UTC
I know that. You know that. Maybe Bill is.....projecting?

;-D hope so.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


(The comment has been removed)

Re: The "juice" is in the Succession tausirhasirim September 27 2006, 20:22:26 UTC
"Koneig probably freaked them out by pointing out a few holes in Crowley to Alpha transmission. And when they were unable to prove him wrong for a lack of evidence they decided that Apostolic Succession was no longer important."

This is precisely my opinion.

Thing is, Scriven and I de facto proved that the OTO does have Apostolic Succession, whether through Grady or through Bill and David and, for that matter, me.

Personally, I think Crowley did have it, and Koenig's 'case' is mere propaganda. The right and wrong of it is less important than the illustration of the mopral and intellectual cowardace of "the great leaders" in the face of what seems to have been the rather shallow opinions of one Swiss crank.

Reply

Re: The "juice" is in the Succession peristera September 28 2006, 00:43:04 UTC
I wouldn't consider myself "scared away" - annoyed to the point of indifference would be more accurate.

Reply

Re: The "juice" is in the Succession tausirhasirim September 28 2006, 06:05:47 UTC
Well said.

Reply


shakti_mouse September 27 2006, 16:27:58 UTC
hmmmmm hawww hmmmm

contemplates

Reply

OM HUM TROM HRE AH tausirhasirim September 27 2006, 20:23:20 UTC
We all should.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up