Leave a comment

Comments 97

rimpala August 26 2012, 18:47:03 UTC
Something to do with "trickle down" is my only guess. I've heard that someone companies are finding out the hard way that the money that is saved overseas mostly stays in their respective countries. I can't for the life of me repeat what I heard verbatim but all I know is that outsourcing has been one of the biggest contributing factors to the recession. People, skilled educated people, are seeing their jobs move elsewhere. It's happened to my own little brother, who's an excellent IT but is having so much trouble getting another job after L3 laid him off. Does anyone know how freaking angry that makes me?

BTW, I really don't see how this post warrants a privilege check, why the defensiveness? O.o

Reply

rick_day August 26 2012, 18:56:21 UTC
BTW, I really don't see how this post warrants a privilege check, why the defensiveness?

Guilt, I guess. According to 'demographics' I should be a full out Tea Bagger. So technically, I'm a traitor, according to 'them'. And those on the other side of the fence are often dismissive of my points because of my gender, race and economic position.

I guess people can't even talk about the far right without somehow bringing up the Patriarchy or racism (sigh)

Reply

paft August 26 2012, 19:01:20 UTC
rd: And those on the other side of the fence are often dismissive of my points because of my gender, race and economic position.

What gender, race, and economic position are you that prompts that reaction?

I've seen no dearth of white male liberals or progressives.

Reply

rick_day August 26 2012, 19:19:35 UTC
What gender, race, and economic position are you that prompts that reaction?

I went over that in my opening comment.

I've seen no dearth of white male liberals or progressives. are you implying I am not progressive because of my race and gender or some generalization about the population of whites or males who may have other than right wing politics?

Tell me you didn't just do to me what you claim others do to you.

Now ,about that tax break....

Reply


dwer August 26 2012, 18:56:33 UTC
not entirely sure what you're getting at here.

Reply

rick_day August 26 2012, 19:27:44 UTC
1. Do you agree or disagree that these three facts are interrelated? If you do, why? I disagree.

2. By what rationale could such a tax break be enacted, that could be sold as something better for the country than no tax break?

3. your confusion confirms my opening comment LOL

Reply

dwer August 26 2012, 20:04:55 UTC
ah. Well, see, what I think is that the country has to have a fundamental change in measuring success on corporate terms. Using layoffs to raise profits shouldn't be praised, it should be condemned. Companies should be looking to balance shareholder benefits with employee benefits. And CEO salaries should be capped at much much lower than where they're allowed to be now.

Reply

chron_job August 26 2012, 20:18:00 UTC
> Using layoffs to raise profits shouldn't be praised, it should be condemned.

Until, of course, market forces are heralded as the ultimate moral arbiter. Then everything profitable is good, by definition!

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

rick_day August 26 2012, 19:24:29 UTC
I see what you mean, but you are taking a view that profit is a finite and limited thing. That is, if you don't compete with the overseas industries, you will go out of business.

I think the problem is more with imports than cheaper labor. Let China make plates for China. Tariffs keep the rich at bay. What does it matter to you if they only make $30 billion, instead of $31 Billion, if it means 10,000 ordinary joes can feed their families?

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

telemann August 26 2012, 19:52:44 UTC
Cheap imports do more for the middle class than anything else.

It sure does, but just not in the way you meant.

Heh.

Reply


korean_guy_01 August 26 2012, 20:00:15 UTC
If we need more revenue, then let's get the IRS out of the way and incorporate a Flat Tax.

Reply

korean_guy_01 August 26 2012, 20:01:31 UTC
*Fair Tax

Reply

ofbg August 26 2012, 22:05:14 UTC
I prefer the flat tax. The fair taxes too insidious. People would have no idea how much tax they're paying.

I would go so far as to eliminate withholding for the flat tax.

If people have to write a check to pay their taxes monthly or quarterly, or even yearly, they would be much more aware of how much tax they paid and how much it hurts and would become more politically active because of that.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


musicpsych August 26 2012, 22:03:08 UTC
ignorant southen white male US citizen with all kinds of 'privilieges'.

Was that someone here, or in a different community? Just wondering... I've stopped going to other communities where people bully and blame white men for all of their problems, and cite their own lack of "privilege" as something that gives them credibility. I hope this community doesn't go down that same route.

Reply

rick_day August 26 2012, 22:16:14 UTC
I had answered this earlier. Form of guilt. According to my herd I "should" think "this" but instead I think "that".

No one in this community has because I choose more carefully what communities I put myself 'out there' for unwarranted attacks.

blackfolk, sf_drama, ONTD, conservatism...each of those places has sharpies lurking under stairwells, attacking out of nowhere, often cross-community.

One of the reasons this is my No 1 interacting community on LJ: there are simply too many international members to all have any one groupthink.

Reply

rimpala August 27 2012, 04:16:15 UTC
Oh god... ONTD... that place is like aspirin.

Wait... no... it's actually the opposite of that thing.

Reply

htpcl August 27 2012, 07:47:50 UTC
What's a Sharpie?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up