Leave a comment

Comments 57

taekarado September 25 2012, 22:46:37 UTC
have i mentioned youve got a great tagging system for these?

Years of biting her tongue and putting up with this shit had worn her down to the point where her temper final snapped beyond repair.
while i can see how the boy who lived not attending hogwarts might be a bit disheartening, after the way harrys acted in the fic thus far, i think mcgonagall would be glad to see the back of him. and in canon shes put up with far worse shit than this, frankly. amycus spat in her face for crying out loud, and harry had to snap for her!

I would also like to remind staff that their contracts stipulate that three reprimands is an automatic one month unpaid suspension and a mandatory review by the board.
why would she need to remind staff of this? that seems like pointless exposition.

Albus picked up the broken wand and noticed that Fawkes feather still held the two parts together,i think phoenix feathers are just as strong as other feathers, and thus this wouldnt be possible. i also think that when harrys wand broke in canon in deathly hallows ( ... )

Reply

szaleniec1000 September 26 2012, 01:23:09 UTC
i think phoenix feathers are just as strong as other feathers, and thus this wouldnt be possible. i also think that when harrys wand broke in canon in deathly hallows it was completely snapped in two, feather broken and everything. but correct me if im wrong, its been a while since i read the books.

I'm not sure there's any significance to this. I think the author just wanted an image of the broken wand being like Ron's wand in Chamber of Secrets, held together by the unicorn hair. The difference there is that unicorn hair is like horse hair only (per canon) even stronger thanks to magic, not, you know, a feather.

okay. if there was a 'goblin' method of dealing with horcruxes, dont you think that would be common knowledge? dont you think that more people would have done that to horcruxes in the timeline before this?! dont you think that voldemort would have done research on this and ordered the exterimation of all pigs during his first regime to prevent this from happening?!Not to mention that Harry blames Dumbledore's "arrogance" ( ... )

Reply


sickbritkid2 September 26 2012, 00:49:11 UTC
Here we see more swearing in one line than Molly did in seven books.

In the mind of this idiot author: Molly making a Precision F-Strike when her daughter is almost slain by Bellatrix Lestrange OBVIOUSLY means she swears like a sailor.

Reply


sickbritkid2 September 26 2012, 00:59:35 UTC
And canon!McGonagall would have a pair of Gryffindors who hexed unarmed people in the middle of the Great Hall in detention before Snape could even blink.

Dude, I'm pretty sure canon!McGonagall and canon!Dumbledore would've had two Gryffindors who hexed unarmed people in the middle of the Great Hall in AZKABAN before Snape could even blink, Boy Who Lived and his wife or not.

Reply


sickbritkid2 September 26 2012, 01:03:47 UTC
Why is nobody else questioning the fact that two eleven-year-olds have shown up on their first day at school as a married couple? Has the almighty power of Harmonian twu wuv turned them all into complete idiots? Or were they just complete idiots to begin with?

Ugh. A pair of eleven year-olds married makes me shudder with Hogwarts Exposed flashbacks.

Something tells me if Neil got his hands on this tripe, he'd have wound up pulling something similar in his series and written it off under "the liberation of the wizarding world."

Reply

szaleniec1000 September 26 2012, 01:28:24 UTC
Neil would have made them actual eleven-year-olds rather than adults trapped in kids' bodies. Much as he did with Caitlin and Emily in HTE22.

Reply

sickbritkid2 September 26 2012, 01:54:18 UTC
My thoughts were more along the lines of "ACTUALLY MARRY Caitlin and Emily together or marry them off to two dumbass twats that they're dating despite not being of age", not necessarily using the Preteen!H/He romance plot from the get-go.

Reply


sickbritkid2 September 26 2012, 01:08:14 UTC
Go back and re-read Chapter 7 of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone and pay close attention to the bit where Harry goes "not Slytherin" and the Hat acknowledges this. Of course, as the author didn't bother actually writing the exchange between Ron and the Hat it reads as another handwave.

I'm guessing that Hermione told the hat that he raped her and the hat's mind then became biased against him, then.

I mean, how else would you describe this ridiculous turn of events? So far, nothing's really happened to truly separate this pile of shite from the main canon aside from Harry and Hermione acting conspicuous as hell regarding their knowledge of the future. So why would things suddenly change so drastically that Ron becomes the first goddamn Weasley to be sorted into fucking Slytherin!? Did the Hat just decide to add insult to injury*?

* Ron suffering a bout of IHTYHAC from Hermione?

Reply

szaleniec1000 September 26 2012, 01:30:40 UTC
I'm guessing that Hermione told the hat that he raped her and the hat's mind then became biased against him, then.

The Hat automatically knew everything that happened in the previous timeline, even before it had a chance to look inside their heads... (wait for it) somehow.

Reply

sickbritkid2 September 26 2012, 01:55:34 UTC
Ah, right, I forgot.

Still leaves open the possibility that the Hat decided to join in on the Weasley hate, though. As if Ron being IHTYHAC'd by Hermione wasn't enough...

Reply

szaleniec1000 September 26 2012, 01:58:29 UTC
I approve of the use of IHTYHAC as a verb. It'll come in quite useful during this story.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up