I´m sorry it rubbed you the wrong way. Why was that? I do not see any difference with Sam or Dean having their bit of fun on the job. It´s the life of a hunter, constantly face to face with death. She did certainly choose an awful guy to do it with though.
At the beginning she. Was all I love John and this and I get she wants that but she for me just kinda took all the love they had and just forgot it even though I know she didn't just odd for me plus she knows ketch is bad at leastI think she does not to mention this group has hurt her boys I don't know the writing this year is just making me feel weird I love the show but I wish the Would try with more consistent story telling . Sorry I rambled lol
Yeah... her line about how she WAS a long term relationship kind of girl but that was a long time ago... was sort of strange. I wonder what she meant by that, since I know she missed the life back in Heaven a lot.
I really don't think she knows how evil Ketch is. Even I don't really know how evil he is - everyone from BMoL says he is, and he wasn't very good with the interrogation scene, but it could be that he just has never been taught to care. Maybe he had a similar upbringing to Mick. I'm keeping an open mind, because he might turn.
Imagine the fandom reaction if they kill off Eileen...
Why couldn't he just keep his mouth shut and pretend to go along with it, THEN go and run over to the Winchesters? DAMN IT!
I meant to say that I was responding to this... he never would've had a chance to run over to the Winchesters, no matter what he said to the BMol.
The sleepover just proves to me that she is a hunter and Dean´s mom. Just, bad choice :P
Well, the bad choice is the issue here, not that she's sleeping around (though I guess this means she's not mourning for John anymore). It's part of long list of bad choices. Why is she totally avoiding her sons, and choosing to hunt with Ketch instead of them?
That is a possibility, although from the way they´ve acted in the past, my thought is they would not have felt the need to talk first if that was the case. I think both are possible.
Ahhh. I see. I rather think she doesn't know how crazy he is, and just sees it as a thing with a fellow hunter. I hope she is wary though.
I think there are many reasons why she would not hunt with Sam and Dean, one big one being that if she does, she is constantly worrying about their safety while huntng. It's also a constant reminder of her failure to keep them from hunting. It is obvious from her talk with Ketch that she wants both family and hunting.
I, for one, am pretty damn proud of Mick for standing up to Hess and defending Sam and Dean as passionately as he did even knowing he could die for refusing to follow orders. Takes a lot of courage to do that and shows how much he has changed since interacting with the boys. And makes it hurt all the more that he's now dead. But at least he died trying to do what he knew was the right thing as Sam implored him to when he was set on killing Eileen. Think the boys would be proud of him too.
I just hope there was some meaning to his death. Yes, it was wonderful that he stood up for what he felt was right, but by getting killed he is unable to even warn the boys or do anything to help their cause. He leaves the boys defenseless. A hero´s death counts for something, if just to buy more time or change someone´s heart in some way. If we can see remnants of that later, that´s really all I hope for. Even a recording telling them what was going on. To make his sacrifice worth something more.
Comments 22
Reply
Reply
Reply
I really don't think she knows how evil Ketch is. Even I don't really know how evil he is - everyone from BMoL says he is, and he wasn't very good with the interrogation scene, but it could be that he just has never been taught to care. Maybe he had a similar upbringing to Mick. I'm keeping an open mind, because he might turn.
Thank you for your thoughts!
Reply
Mary better have some kind of end-game that excuses all this. Ketch sees her as psychotic as he is. I'm beginning to wonder a bit myself.
Reply
Reply
They would've killed Mick either way. He had already "failed" them, and they have zero tolerance for that.
The hunter sleepover and Mary continuing to avoid her sons (even though she has no reason to). As if I needed more reasons to dislike Mary.. *sigh*
Reply
Yes, of course. Still it seems to me the writers wasted a character. We´ll see though.
The sleepover just proves to me that she is a hunter and Dean´s mom. Just, bad choice :P
Reply
Why couldn't he just keep his mouth shut and pretend to go along with it, THEN go and run over to the Winchesters? DAMN IT!
I meant to say that I was responding to this... he never would've had a chance to run over to the Winchesters, no matter what he said to the BMol.
The sleepover just proves to me that she is a hunter and Dean´s mom. Just, bad choice :P
Well, the bad choice is the issue here, not that she's sleeping around (though I guess this means she's not mourning for John anymore). It's part of long list of bad choices. Why is she totally avoiding her sons, and choosing to hunt with Ketch instead of them?
Reply
That is a possibility, although from the way they´ve acted in the past, my thought is they would not have felt the need to talk first if that was the case. I think both are possible.
Ahhh. I see. I rather think she doesn't know how crazy he is, and just sees it as a thing with a fellow hunter. I hope she is wary though.
I think there are many reasons why she would not hunt with Sam and Dean, one big one being that if she does, she is constantly worrying about their safety while huntng. It's also a constant reminder of her failure to keep them from hunting. It is obvious from her talk with Ketch that she wants both family and hunting.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
To make his sacrifice worth something more.
Reply
Leave a comment