Title
Adult content warnings should respect existing cut tags
Short, concise description of the idea
Posts which already have a cut tag should not be completely hidden if they are marked as having adult concepts or content; instead, they should be rendered as normal, with the warning page appearing between the cut and the full post.
Full description
(
Read more... )
Comments 17
To reduce the possibility for abuse, if something was not previously flagged as adult content by the poster or the community it's in, and has to be reported and flagged by the Abuse Prevention Team, I'd say have the whole entry covered. This would unnecessarily hide content that the poster was being responsible with their lj-cuts with, but just didn't flag themselves, but would cover most abuse I could think of.
Alternately, after the adult content warning is clicked through, display the entry in its cut view first.
Reply
Reply
Reply
The problem is that just because an entry that contains adult content has an LJ-cut, it does not necessarily mean that the user is using the LJ-cut to hide the adult content. What if someone has a post that has one explicit picture, and then a cut then ten other explicit pictures, because they were cutting not for explicitness, but for space reasons?
Not everyone follows the convention of using the LJ-cut to hide adult content, either because they never used it for those reasons anyway, or because they think that once they've marked their journal adult content, they don't need to worry about that cutting anymore.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment