Unlimited Userpics

Mar 03, 2007 16:02


Title
Unlimited Userpics

Short, concise description of the idea
I want unlimited userpics. Would be happy to pay.

Full description of the ideaMy userpics are maxed out, but if I want to rotate them, I'll lose all pic designations for the individual posts for the deleted userpic. I really want unlimited userpics...and would be very happy to pay for ( Read more... )

paid features, userpics, upgrade features, § no status

Leave a comment

Comments 43

adudeabides March 6 2007, 18:37:01 UTC
As with the other suggestion on userpics my vote goes no.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

paranoidandroid March 6 2007, 22:04:45 UTC
Surely an unlimited amount would be the only reasonable price to pay? ;)

Reply

tmelange March 6 2007, 23:54:41 UTC
I would pay whatever it costs. It's a feature that I want, hence, price is not a deciding factor to me. I spend an inordinate amount of time on LJ; I want my user experience to be what I want it to be--and I can't imagine the amount of money would be so high as to scare me away.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


zhonnika March 6 2007, 18:43:25 UTC
Not if it slows down the site, no. Userpics aren't worth my not being able to load pages.

Reply

sofiaviolet March 6 2007, 18:48:01 UTC
+1

Reply

dawna March 6 2007, 18:54:04 UTC
+1

Reply

rebelsheart March 6 2007, 19:03:08 UTC
+1

Reply


flamencanyc March 6 2007, 19:27:05 UTC
Yes. Yes! YES!

While unlimited userpics may be impractical, PLEASE give us some method by which to have significantly more userpics! At least several hundred if not the several thousand that greatestjournal allows (for free no less). I'd gladly pay more if need be. This is my major frustration with LJ. 115 is just too restrictive.

(And yes, I have no need for voice posting and would willingly give it up as well if that would help.)

Reply


lisacharly March 6 2007, 19:57:25 UTC
I'd love to have more userpics. I doubt even raising to 200 would be too much a strain on the server, and GJ does it just fine.

Reply

lied_ohne_worte March 6 2007, 21:47:11 UTC
As far as I know, it works for them because they have far less users than LJ does.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up