the case against hysteria101

[writinchica2k]

On May 14, sphinxofthenile reported that hysteria101 reposted her Avengers fanart without giving proper credit, subsequently deleted moderators' comments regarding credit, and overall appearing beligerent on the subject

Comments

[tessisamess]

*fistbumps sphinxofthenile* Good on you for standing up for what was yours.

After reading Witchild's quote, I am just... there are no words for this person's ridiculousness.

[sphinxofthenile]

I've had my fill of fighting windmills trolls for a good while. I'm glad I got to settle this in a different manner without having to just stand back and watch.

[velvetwhip]

I am amazed she didn't reply in the same polite, mature, and reasonable manner in which she has been documented as responding in the past. Gosh.

Gabrielle

[amorettea]

Would her explanation be honest? hi. I'm a shrill little twit who steals stuff for ego boo and whine when caught out.

[hoshiko_2000]

So, it turns out that she was an all-out-troll afterall.

But on an added note, mods can't ban users from LJ coms 0.0? How the hell are they meant to deal with trolls then? Surely groups have the right to ban users whose behaviour offends, upsets, or causes problems for the other members.

[sinfulslasher]

Of course mods can ban users from comms. I've done it before. :) So I'm a bit confused by witchild's comment, to be honest. *ponders*

[hoshiko_2000]

That's what I thought. Maybe it's that specific coms rules or something 0.0?

[sphinxofthenile]

I little late to my own party, but I just wanted to thank you for the work you've put into the investigation. It is a great comfort to know that she is now pointed out for others to watch out for.