Comments | spiderichman: Up and atom! Up and at them!

spiderichman

Up and atom! Up and at them!

Jul 01, 2006 11:20

So I saw Superman last night. It was good, definately a lot of fun. However, despite the funness, there are a few nit pickers i have with the movie. First off, Lois Lane was all wrong. She was too pretty, and we never got to see her "die hard reporter" side. Clark was under-played, so much to the point, where he seemed to really only be in ( Read more... )

weekend, celebrities, superman, c-m u, spoiler, spider-man

Comments 7

roofpig13 July 1 2006, 17:20:02 UTC

Dude, I would have sent you some fan art, but I'm having trouble keeping up with my own comic. As it stands, I'll probably have to take a week off myself to fly home for my grandmother's funeral, which could happen any day now.

Don't worry about taking a little time off. Most starting webcartoonists do it. Hell, even the veterans take hiatuses (hiati?) and they don't always have fan art or filler. You aren't getting paid for this job, so you're allowed to take time off. ;-)

Wrong anonymous July 5 2006, 14:05:27 UTC

Your Mallrats argument holds no water, because Superman Returns is supposed to follow Superman 2. If this is too vague IM me or something and I'll firther tell you why you were wrong lol. Also Kate Bosworth wasn't wrong for Lois Lane because she's pretty, Losi has always been cast pretty. KB was wrong bc she's too fucking young, she's only like 24 or something. Also she can't act.

Re: Wrong jennenen July 5 2006, 14:05:57 UTC

Oooops that was me... forgot to log in

Re: Wrong spiderichman July 5 2006, 14:37:41 UTC

Yes, it is supposed to take place after superman two, but the thing that is revealed in Superman Returns means that what they talk about in Mallrats had to happen, but how could it happen without serious physical alements?

Re: Wrong jennenen July 5 2006, 19:31:14 UTC

Dude he nailed her in Superman 2

Thread 6