When I was talking about the Outsiders, I was talking about an entirely different issue than what most of you guys responded with. That's OK, because both of them are really good points. But I do want to be clear about what I was trying to say
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
As for Outdwellers, I consider them those that are not in harmony with that particular rite for some reason. So in a way, when I am making offerings to the Outdwellers, I am simply saying, "No disruptions, please." It seems to work. :D
Reply
(Side note- there's an interesting character in Charles De Lint's Newford books named Christianne. She's one of the other character's shadow come to life. Instead of being a "bad" person, she's all the things Christie rejected about himself when he was about 7. While he was trying to keep his head down & not be noticed, she's bold & adventurous & very outspoken- not to mention being a "she" instead of a "he". Both characters are adults in the books & Christie's brother Gordie observes at one point that now they're both a lot more alike than either admits to)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
When things are more eclectic, though, how does that work? I've been to theoretically Celtic rituals in which others brought in everyone but the kitchen sink! (And no, it wasn't me. :) ) I think things could get more complicated, and possibly iffy, with that.
But hey- I'm not a good choice for participation in such things anyway, I suspect. I tend to be more interested in the edges than the center, anyway- or in how things fail, and fail to fail safely. The cracks. It works OK for me personally in many ways, but does make me a not-so-good choice to be in groups.
Reply
Personally, I think you'd fit in just fine with the group we've got going now, since we're all oddballs & misfits (and quite comfortable with being oddballs & misfits).
Reply
Leave a comment