[The video feed starts with a screen of bright blue; one that only shows itself to be something other than a technical error when a wisp of white rare to the sky today peeks into view. The microphone rumbles with the breeze whipping across it. After a moment of this, things seem to calm, and the camera is turned on Kazuhiko's face
(
Read more... )
Comments 358
Only monsters aren't people.
Reply
You're exactly right, Nana. You don't have to be human to be a person. I'm sure you're as much of a person as everyone else.
What sort of monsters aren't people?
Reply
People who hurt others for no reason and like it.
Reply
Those are very scary people, aren't they? There are a lot of them in this city.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
And what's happened to you?
Reply
Given that they actually exist at all. If there could ever be such a thing. [Please say there can't be. A beat of time between the second question and its answer.]
You would be one of the few to believe that I don't actually remember what happened.
Reply
It happened to Shinji, then?
Reply
He's the only one who would willingly put himself in a gun fight, I would think.
Reply
Amamiya-san, I'm glad you're doing all right. Ooe-san was pretty worked up.
[ That name, Urick...? No, it's not one which is that uncommon. Maybe it's not the same person... then again, she's seen far too much to believe in coincidence. As to his question... ]
...I have a friend who would say that the line doesn't exist at all.
Reply
[It feels strange to have so many people concerned and while the responses are automatic, they're not without a sense of discomfort and awkward.]
Is that what you believe?
Reply
[ A pause. ]
Within the limits of what I define as humanity... yes, I do believe that.
Reply
We can only base our opinions on what we know, you don't have to hesitate. [And a deep breath.] Do you think that all people are monsters, or rather that there are no monsters at all.
Reply
[And there's a pause before Naoya chuckles. Oh, isn't this just precious.] There's a problem in that you're conflating 'humanity' with being a person...
But everyone defines their own lines, and whether or not they can change. It's the nature of free will.
Reply
[A brow arches.] Humanity and the state of being a person are not confined to someone with specifically homo-sapien DNA, if that's what you mean.
Reply
[And then he...laughs again. Uh-oh.] DNA has nothing to do with it. The problem is 'humanity' generally includes a scope of morality that cannot be applied universally. You can lack it and still be definable as a person.
Reply
[Automatic response, and on to more important things.] And what scope of morality might that be.
Reply
Leave a comment