"We little realize that the question, "Why should we marry at all?" is predicated on a flawed perception of humanity. In today's world, we look upon ourselves as being whole, complete individuals. Although we readily acknowledge our blemishes and imperfections, we do not see ourselves as being fundamentally incomplete or deficient. We believe
(
Read more... )
Comments 3
Reply
So I think the points you quote above are valid, but that two isn't enough (and not, this isn't a defense of polyamory, which is a much trickier subject--it's a defense of intense group life and joy in that context).
http://www.salon.com/books/review/2007/01/22/ehrenreich/
http://www.barbaraehrenreich.com/dancinginthestreets.htm
See what random thoughts your posts provoke? :-}
Reply
solid coping skills for life issues, and severely limited ones for relationship issues. Such people
are often better off without a partner. Some pairs of people work very well paired off. Some
people have more needs or fewer need-serving skills, and work better in groups. And, as ever,
I believe that two people are not nearly enough to raise children. Children are a lot of work and
a huge source of frustration and joy. Sharing that frustration protects both the children and
adults. Sharing that joy improves everybody's lives. And the more different personalities and
role models children are exposed to, the better they'll understand themselves and others.
In short, two isn't a magic number for everybody.
Reply
Leave a comment