Romenesko's summary: A suburban Chicago woman's refusal to watch a videotape that reputedly depicts her gang rape
could end up derailing the trial of one of her accused attackers. Also, she could be held in contempt of court.
And now I just threw up a little bit.
Comments 8
Reply
I am so incoherently angry.
I can't even form cohesive sentences.
Properly depicting my disgust.
Reply
This tale begins in the wee hours of June 6, 2004, when a distraught Tamara Anne Moonier entered a Fullerton police station. She said she'd been kidnapped a few hours earlier from a parking lot at Heroes Bar & Grill, hooded and driven to an unknown residence. Moonier, then 28, told police that a group of men brutally raped her at gunpoint for more than an hour, forced her to perform numerous degrading sex acts on film, demanded her silence and then released her.
Reply
That crazy bitch got MARRIED since then. *boggles*
Shows you where my priorities are.
Reply
Reply
HOWEVER.
It would, ultimately, be to her benefit to watch the tape. She says she was unconscious during the rape and doesn't remember it. That much makes sense, but there you go: she doesn't really know what happened. It may give her panic attacks, it may make her throw up a lot in her mouth, but she should find out how the attack played out, so that she can understand what was done to her. If she never understands that attack, then IMO, she'll never really recover from it. Knowledge is power, and she is currently without it.
Reply
And that's something that was done with my full knowledge and permission.
I absolutely *can* *not* *imagine* choosing to watch something in which I was physically violated without my permission.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment