Rant Post

Dec 12, 2011 01:45

Previous (Full) Rant Post

No real directions, but this isn't a place for debate. It's a place for RANTIN' AND RAVIN'.

There is a rule: There is to be no calling out anyone by name in Rants, Chatter, or on the Meme itself. This only produces an atmosphere of animosity and it is no longer tolerated. If you see any names being ranted about, please link ( Read more... )

rants

Leave a comment

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 12 2011, 09:48:51 UTC
Did it occur to you that, having been fairly well immersed in (a) feminist (sub)culture for quite a long time, one which (to my occasional chagrin) I value, I might choose to express weariness and disaffection with its often-empty formalitiesI'm pretty certain it didn't occur to the anon you replied to, just as it didn't occur to me, for the very simple reason of you not saying anything like that. We don't know who you are. It's great you're immersed in feminism and value it, so do I -- but how on earth could anyone know that from one line saying ~"Not unless you really need them, and this isn't some cheesy grrrrrlpowery way of making things "equal""~ ?? I'm sorry, but it's the internet, all you have as a means of expression are letters on the screen. No other context. No other indication what you might mean. Especially when you're anon. Because the way your comment is phrased, it can easily be interpreted as disrespectful towards feminism. Very easily. We can't read your thoughts, and sorry, but context is most of what makes the ( ... )

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 14 2011, 09:58:13 UTC
Which brings me to: duh-WHAT?

Well, your initial reaction to the first comment by the OP had the same effect on me. You've assumed something really far-fetched in response to a comment that gave you no evidence whatsoever to be what you thought it would be.

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 14 2011, 23:56:59 UTC
Yeah. I could tease out the supposed evidence I had, and say something like oh, but it was a challenge or a question, not an accusation, but the original error is pretty clear.

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 15 2011, 00:11:22 UTC
I read it the same way that the AYRT did. It looked like "now it's the girls' turn!" to me.

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 14 2011, 09:52:29 UTC
reviling anyone at length with so little solid supporting evidence is one of the most repulsive human habits.

I agree.

I am ashamed when I find I have done so. Which, of course, I have.

...this time, too.

It seems that all this wank is just a great exchange of jumped-to conclusions and far-fetched assumptions about complete strangers, on both sides.

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 12 2011, 21:12:14 UTC
So basically you were trolling and then you... came over here and made an entirely new post to justify your trolling?

I have problems understanding your logic. Or lack thereof.

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 13 2011, 01:34:26 UTC
We all have weaknesses. Some of us are compulsively nasty and argumentative. Some of us are recreational scolds. Thanks for following! Always happy to entertain.

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 13 2011, 08:09:33 UTC
Not... really. Some of us are dickheads. Some of us actually care about not offending people purposefully and then laughing and pointing when they dare to respond to you.

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 14 2011, 01:34:00 UTC
No, you.

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 14 2011, 01:47:15 UTC
Now, now, be nice. They got all dressed up to do battle with an anti-feminist homophobe and now have no place to go, except to call you an all-round horrible person while trying to remember not to use the "b" word. Imagine how frustrating.

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 14 2011, 01:56:52 UTC
Imagine how *I* feel, completely derailing a nice round of oral sex just because I couldn't shut up my inner heckler. And now they have a secret party in a new post and I'm not invited.

*snivel*

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 14 2011, 02:16:26 UTC
Jesus, you just can't shut up, can you?

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 14 2011, 02:35:10 UTC
To be fair, she was responding to me. How about you?

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 14 2011, 04:11:27 UTC
Yours would have been a better last line to leave it at, though.

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 14 2011, 04:01:46 UTC
That's the way to get it to happen, too. 10K, here we come!

Reply

Re: alright then. cunt wank. anonymous December 14 2011, 09:42:55 UTC
Well, I was surprised by the kind of fantasy story you spun. I mean, wow, you're amazing if you can read a person's whole ideology and attitude towards feminism from one short comment. You clearly know them well, or just are a mind-reader.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up