First of all, this in no way changes any of my previous entry about the way the article was framed, especially in regards to the victim-blaming that I still feel was very prevalent in the NY Times article. However, more information has come to light making the reporting more complex, as there are several more issues at play.
BUT LET'S BE CLEAR.
(
Read more... )
Comments 20
Reply
Have you seen what clothing is marketed towards 11-year old girls lately? Any clothing-related blame here belongs to Wal*Mart, not the mother. And, frankly, there is a constant give-and-take for dealing with kids. Too much pushing and they run in the direction you were warning against.
11 is a perfectly appropriate age for someone to travel home alone from school or to have unsupervised outdoor time alone. 11 is not an appropriate age for someone to be having sex, which is why, even if she was wearing skimpy lingerie and on her hands and knees literally begging to show them a good time, it's still rape. Thus, again, clothing=red herring.
However, what if this is a witch hunt fueled by racial tension?Yanno, I totally had that thought myself, until I remembered that they took videos of themselves raping an 11-year old. Sadly, it is much more realistic that they felt this was a means of relieving the racial tension by taking their frustrations out ( ... )
Reply
Reply
NO
If we're going to blame any parents, let's blame the parents of the men and boys who chose to violate an 11 year old for not raising those men and boys to respect women. HOWEVER, the ONLY blame lies with those men and boys. They made the choice to do harm.
11 year olds do not need 24/7 supervision. Hell, I started babysitting at 12. You're buying into the same patriarchal, misogynistic bullshit as the victim blamers. THE ONLY PEOPLE TO BLAME FOR A CRIME ARE THE PEOPLE WHO COMMITTED THE CRIME. Full stop.
Reply
Reply
Reply
NO
You are wrong. Flat out wrong. In fact, the articles about this situation are a prime example of why you are wrong. These 18 men and boys who were accused of rape are being defended while the 11 year old victim is being villified. That is because we live in a rape culture and people think this kind of behavior is okay.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Regarding the girl's dress, it does inform on the situation. Don't get me wrong, they're still predators (AND rapists, this wouldn't be ok if she were 18), but I would have a different interpretation about a case where an 11 year old girl was dressed in baggy corduroys and a case where she's in a mini-skirt and makeup. She's not asking for it, but it's a different sort of predation.
Reply
Leave a comment